Influence of isofocal intraocular lenses on objective refraction based on autorefraction and aberrometry

dc.contributor.authorPérez Sanz, Lidia María
dc.contributor.authorCharbel, Carla
dc.contributor.authorPoyales Galán, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorGarzón Jiménez, Nuria
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-22T11:16:35Z
dc.date.available2023-06-22T11:16:35Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-12
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate and compare the objective refractions obtained by autorefraction and aberrometry under different lighting conditions with an isofocal intraocular lens (Isopure, BVI medical, Liége, Belgium) compared to a monofocal control lens (Micropure, BVI medical, Liége, Belgium) with the same platform and material. Methods: Prospective, comparative and randomized study on patients undergoing cataract surgery and bilateral isofocal or monofocal IOL implantation. A total of 44 subjects were randomly assigned to either the isofocal group (n = 22) or the Micropure (n = 22). Manifest refraction (MR) was always performed under the same lighting conditions for all the patients. For objective refraction the autorefractor KR8800 and the aberrometer OPD-Scan III (Nidek Inc., Tokyo, Japan.) were used. For each eye included in the study, six result sets were collected: MR, AR (autorefraction measured with the autorefractor), WF-P and WF-M (Zernike-coefficients-based objective refraction, photopic and mesopic pupil size), OPD-C and OPD-M (autorefraction measured with the aberrometer in photopic and mesopic conditions). Results The mean sphere for MR was 0.03 ± 0.32D for the Isopure group and 0.24 ± 0.22D for the monofocal group (p = 0.013). For the Isopure group, Friedman analysis showed statistically significant differences for sphere measured with WF-P (p = 0.035), WF-M (p = 0.018) and OPD-M (p = 0.000), and SE measured with OPD-M (p = 0.004). In the Micropure lens group, the Friedman analysis showed differences for all values studied (p < 0.05). Correlation coefficients showed that AR is the objective method with the strongest correlation values for all components of refraction for both groups. Conclusion: The modification of the surfaces of the isofocal lens does not have a negative impact on the refraction obtained by AR compared to a standard monofocal intraocular lens.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Optometría y Visión
dc.description.facultyFac. de Óptica y Optometría
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/78281
dc.identifier.dois00417-023-06102-4
dc.identifier.issn0721-832X
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06102-4
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00417-023-06102-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/72273
dc.issue.number6102
dc.journal.titleGraefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
dc.language.isospa
dc.page.initial10
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted access
dc.subject.cdu617.7-089.243
dc.subject.cdu681.73
dc.subject.cdu617.7-001.15
dc.subject.cdu535.313.6
dc.subject.keywordIsofocal
dc.subject.keywordIntraocular lens
dc.subject.keywordObjective refraction
dc.subject.keywordSubjective refraction
dc.subject.keywordAberrometry
dc.subject.keywordAutorefraction
dc.subject.ucmCirugía
dc.subject.ucmOptometría
dc.subject.ucmÓptica oftálmica
dc.subject.unesco3213 Cirugía
dc.subject.unesco2209.15 Optometría
dc.titleInfluence of isofocal intraocular lenses on objective refraction based on autorefraction and aberrometry
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication367ce491-287f-4b2a-ba6a-870a393c5609
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery367ce491-287f-4b2a-ba6a-870a393c5609
Download
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
417_2023_6102_Author Galeradas.pdf
Size:
1.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Collections