Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Abstract argumentation with qualitative uncertainty: an analysis in dynamic logic

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Full text at PDC

Publication date

2021

Advisors (or tutors)

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Citations
Google Scholar

Citation

Herzig, A., Yuste-Ginel, A. (2021). Abstract Argumentation with Qualitative Uncertainty: An Analysis in Dynamic Logic. In: Baroni, P., Benzmüller, C., Wáng, Y.N. (eds) Logic and Argumentation. CLAR 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13040. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_11

Abstract

We extend the existing encoding of abstract argumentation frameworks in DL-PA (Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments) in order to capture different formalisms for arguing with qualitative forms of uncertainty. More in particular, we encode the main reasoning tasks of (rich) incomplete argumentation frameworks and control argumentation frameworks. After that, and inspired by our encoding, we define and study a new class of structures that are shown to be maximally expressive: constrained incomplete argumentation frameworks.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Description

Keywords

Collections