Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Can physiological stimulation prior to ileostomy closure reduce postoperative ileus: a prospective multicenter pilot study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Full text at PDC

Publication date

2022

Advisors (or tutors)

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer Nature
Citations
Google Scholar

Citation

Ocaña J, García-Pérez JC, Labalde-Martínez M, Rodríguez-Velasco G, Moreno I, Vivas A, Clemente-Esteban I, Ballestero A, Abadía P, Ferrero E, Fernández-Cebrián JM, Die J. Can physiological stimulation prior to ileostomy closure reduce postoperative ileus? A prospective multicenter pilot study. Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Aug;26(8):645-653. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02620-1. Epub 2022 May 21. PMID: 35596903.

Abstract

Background The aim of this study was to assess the impact of ileostomy closure following preoperative physiological stimulation (PPS) on postoperative ileus (POI) in patients with loop ileostomy after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Methods Patients who underwent ileostomy closure between January 2017 and February 2020 in two tertiary referral centers were prospectively included. PPS stimulation was compared to standard treatment. Stimulation was carried out daily during the 15 days prior to ileostomy closure by the patient's self-instillation of 200 ml of fecal contents from the ileostomy bag via the efferent loop, using a rectal catheter. Standard treatment (ST) consisted of observation. Outcomes measures were POI, morbidity, stimulation feasibility, and predictors to ileus. Results A total of 58 patients were included [42 males and 16 females, median age 67 (43–85) years]. PPS was used in 24 patients, who completed the entire stimulation process, and ST in 34 patients. No differences in preoperative factors were found between the two groups. POI was significantly lower in the PPS group (4.2%) vs the ST group (32.4%); p < 0.01, OR: 0.05 (CI 95% 0.01–0.65). The PPS group had a shorter time to restoration of bowel function (1 day vs 3 days) p = 0.02 and a shorter time to tolerance of liquids (1 day vs 2 days), p = 0.04. Age (p = 0.01), open approach at index surgery, p = 0.03, adjuvant capecitabine (p = 0.01). and previous abdominal surgeries (p = 0.02) were associated with POI in the multivariate analysis. C-reactive-protein values on the 3rd (p = 0.02) and 5th (p < 0.01) postoperative day were also associated with POI. Conclusions PPS for patients who underwent ileostomy closure after low anterior resection for rectal cancer is feasible and might reduce POI.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Description

Unesco subjects

Keywords

Collections