What dynamics can be expected for mixed states in two-slit experiments?

dc.contributor.authorLuis Aina, Alfredo
dc.contributor.authorSanz, Ángel S.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-18T06:45:51Z
dc.date.available2023-06-18T06:45:51Z
dc.date.issued2015-06
dc.description© 2015 Elsevier Inc. Support from the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (Spain) under Project Nos. FIS2011-29596-C02-01 (AS) and FIS2012-35583 (AL), and a "Ramon y Cajal" Research Fellowship with Ref. RYC-2010-05768 (AS) is acknowledged.
dc.description.abstractWeak-measurement-based experiments (Kocsis et al., 2011) have shown that, at least for pure states, the average evolution of independent photons in Young's two-slit experiment is in compliance with the trajectories prescribed by the Bohmian formulation of quantum mechanics. But, what happens if the same experiment is repeated assuming that the wave function associated with each particle is different, i.e., in the case of mixed (incoherent) states? This question is investigated here by means of two alternative numerical simulations of Young's experiment, purposely devised to be easily implemented and tested in the laboratory. Contrary to what could be expected a priori, it is found that even for conditions of maximal mixedness or incoherence (total lack of interference fringes), experimental data will render a puzzling and challenging outcome: the average particle trajectories will still display features analogous to those for pure states, i.e., independently of how mixedness arises, the associated dynamics is influenced by both slits at the same time. Physically this simply means that weak measurements are not able to discriminate how mixedness arises in the experiment, since they only provide information about the averaged system dynamics.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Óptica
dc.description.facultyFac. de Ciencias Físicas
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO), España
dc.description.sponsorshipPrograma Ramon y Cajal
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/31325
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aop.2015.03.030
dc.identifier.issn0003-4916
dc.identifier.officialurlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2015.03.030
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/24084
dc.journal.titleAnnals of physics
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final107
dc.page.initial95
dc.publisherElsevier Masson
dc.relation.projectIDFIS2011-29596-C02-01
dc.relation.projectIDFIS2012-35583
dc.relation.projectIDRYC-2010-05768
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.cdu535
dc.subject.keywordBohmian mechanics
dc.subject.keywordWeak values
dc.subject.keywordQuantum
dc.subject.keywordTrajectories
dc.subject.keywordTomography
dc.subject.ucmÓptica (Física)
dc.subject.unesco2209.19 Óptica Física
dc.titleWhat dynamics can be expected for mixed states in two-slit experiments?
dc.typejournal article
dc.volume.number357
dcterms.references[1] J.S. Lundeen, B. Sutherland, A. Patel, C. Stewart, C. Bamber, Nature 474 (2011) 188–191. [2] S. Kocsis, B. Braverman, S. Ravets, M.J. Stevens, R.P. Mirin, L.K. Shalm, A.M. Steinberg, Science 332 (2011) 1170–1173. [3] Y. Aharonov, D.Z. Albert, L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 1351–1354. [4] Y. Aharonov, L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. A 41 (1990) 11–20. [5] J. Dressel, M. Malik, F.M. Miatto, A.N. Jordan, R.W. Boyd, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 (2014) 307–316. [6] K. Vogel, H. Risken, Phys. Rev. A 40 (1989) 2847–2849. [7] D.T. Smithey, M. Beck, M.G. Raymer, A. Faridani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 1244–1247. [8] T.J. Dunn, I.A. Walmsley, S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 884–887. [9] D. Leibfried, D.M. Meekhof, B.E. King, C. Monroe, W.M. Itano, D.J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 4281–4285. [10] C.R. Leavens, Found. Phys. 35 (2005) 469–491. [11] H.M. Wiseman, New J. Phys. 9 (2007) 165(1–12). [12] R. Mir, J.S. Lundeen, M.W. Mitchell, A.M. Steinberg, J.L. Garretson, H.M. Wiseman, New J. Phys. 9 (2007) 287(1–11). [13] A. Matzkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 150407(1–4). [14] W.P. Schleich, M. Freyberger, M.S. Zubairy, Phys. Rev. A 87 (2013) 014102(1–4). [15] K.Y. Bliokh, A.Y. Bekshaev, A.G. Kofman, F. Nori, New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 073022(1–17). [16] B. Braverman, C. Simon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 060406(1–5). [17] E. Madelung, Z. Phys. 40 (1926) 322–326. [18] D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85 (1952) 166–179. [19] A.S. Sanz, S. Miret-Artés, A Trajectory Description of Quantum Processes. I. Fundamentals, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 850 Springer, Berlin, 2012. [20] B.J. Hiley, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 361 (2012) 012014(1–11). [21] G. Matteucci, M. Pezzi, G. Pozzi, G.L. Alberghi,F. Giorgi, A. Gabrielli, N.S. Cesari, M. Villa, A. Zoccoli, S. Frabboni, G.C. Gazzadi, Eur. J. Phys. 34 (2013) 511–517. [22] C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Hermann, Paris, 1977. [23] A.S. Sanz, F. Borondo, Eur. Phys. J. D 44 (2007) 319–326. [24] A.S. Sanz, S. Miret-Artés, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 (2008) 435303(1–23). [25] A.S. Sanz, F. Borondo, Chem. Phys. Lett. 478 (2009) 301–306. [26] M. Davidović, A.S. Sanz, M. Božić, D. Arsenović, D. Dimić, Phys. Scr. T153 (2013) 014015(1–5). [27] A.S. Sanz, S. Miret-Artés, A Trajectory Description of Quantum Processes. II. Applications, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 831 Springer, Berlin, 2014. [28] T. Wünscher, H. Hauptmann, F. Herrmann, Am. J. Phys. 70 (2002) 599–606. [29] A.S. Sanz, M. Davidović, M. Božić, S. Miret-Artés, Ann. Phys. 325 (2010) 763–784. [30] M. Božić, M. Davidović, T.L. Dimitrova, S. Miret-Artés, A.S. Sanz, A. Weis, J. Russ. Laser Res. 31 (2010) 117–128. [31] A.S. Sanz, M. Davidović, M. Božić, Ann. Phys. 353 (2015) 205-221. [32] A. Peres, Stud. History Philos. Modern Physics 33 (2002) 23–34. [33] G. Grössing, S. Fussy, J.M. Pascasio, H. Schwabl, Ann. Phys. 353 (2015) 271–281. [34] G. Grössing, S. Fussy, J.M. Pascasio, H. Schwabl, Ann. Phys. 327 (2012) 421–437. [35] J.S. Lundeen, C. Bamber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 070402(1–5). [36] C. Bamber, J.S. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 070405(1–6).
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb6f1fe2b-ee48-4add-bb0d-ffcbfad10da2
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb6f1fe2b-ee48-4add-bb0d-ffcbfad10da2

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Luis,A141 postprint.pdf
Size:
305.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections