Cytotoxicity, proapoptotic activity and drug-like potential of quercetin and kaempferol in glioblastoma cells: preclinical insights

Abstract

Despite the increasing understanding of the pathogenesis of glioblastoma (GBM), treatment options for this tumor remain limited. Recently, the therapeutic potential of natural compounds has attracted great interest. Thus, dietary flavonoids quercetin (QCT) and kaempferol (KMF) were investigated as potential cytostatic agents in GBM. Moreover, the physicochemical properties of QCT and KMF, determining their bioavailability and therapeutic efficiency, were evaluated. We proved that both polyphenols significantly reduced the viability of GBM cells. We also demonstrated that both QCT and KMF evoked the cytotoxic effect in T98G cells via induction of apoptotic cell death as shown by increased activity of caspase 3/7 and caspase 9 together with an overexpression of the cleaved form of PARP. Apoptosis was additionally accompanied by the activation of stress responses in QCT- and KMF-treated cells. Both polyphenols caused oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, as demonstrated by the increased generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), deregulated expressions of superoxide dismutases (SOD2 and Sod1 on protein and transcriptomic levels, respectively), as well as an overexpression of ERO1α, GRP78, p-JNK, and an up-regulation of Chop, Atf4 and Atf6α genes. The antitumor effect of QCT and KMF was also confirmed in vivo, showing reduced growth of tumor xenografts in the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) experiment. Moreover, electrophoretic light scattering (ELS) was used to measure the zeta potential of cell membranes upon exposition to QCT and KMF. Additionally, on the basis of existing physicochemical data, the drug-likeness score of QCT and KMF was evaluated. Analyses showed that both compounds accomplish Lipinski’s Rule of 5, and they both fit into the criteria of good central nervous system (CNS) drugs. Altogether, our data support the idea that QCT and KMF might be plausible candidates for evaluation as therapeutic agents in preclinical models of glioblastoma.