Vertebrate host or tick vector? Which is to blame for Borrelia lusitaniae population structure?
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2026
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
Norte, A. C., Carretero, M. A., da Silva, L. P., Moreno-Rueda, G., Garrido-Bautista, J., Zamora-Camacho, F. J., Comas, M., Gomez-Ramirez, F., Rato, C., Ramos, J. A., Rocha, A., Laghzaoui, E.-M., Megía-Palma, R., Civantos, E., Núncio, M. S., Lopes de Carvalho, I., Fingerle, V., & Margos, G. (2026). Vertebrate host or tick vector? Which is to blame for Borrelia lusitaniae population structure? Anaerobe, 97(103032). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2026.103032
Abstract
Objective
Borrelia lusitaniae is a lizard-associated spirochaete which shows highly genetically structured populations in western Europe. Our objective was to assess whether selective forces acting on the Ixodes tick vector or the reservoir lizard, Psammodromus algirus, shaped its population structure.
Methods
We collected ticks feeding on P. algirus in the Iberian Peninsula and north Africa, and genetically characterized B. lusitaniae, the infected ticks, and the vertebrate host.
Results
The goeBURST analysis on seven MLST B. lusitaniae genes identified two main clusters: one from central Europe and other from north Africa and Portugal (south of Tagus river), with some connections between the north Tagus populations in central Spain and north African ones. The Ixodes sp. nuclear gene trospA did not entirely correspond with the B. lusitaniae population structure. The P. algirus's phylogeny based on the ND4 mitochondrial gene also did not show lineage distinctions between north and south Tagus.
Conclusion
Both the clustering of B. lusitaniae lineages from this region together with those of south Portugal and north Africa, and the presence of ticks belonging to different trospA clades, suggests Central Spain, a contact area between lineages of P. algirus, as pivotal in the phylogeography of the host, its ticks and Borrelia.
Description
Pablo Romero-Melero and Jesús Arca helped to capture lizards in Granada. Lorenzo Papaleo and Sofía Arce assisted in field work in Grândola. We thank the COST Action CA21170 “Prevention, anticipation and mitigation of tick-borne disease risk applying the DAMA protocol – PRAGMATICK” for promoting networking among researchers on tick and tick-borne diseases that contributed to share ideas on the topic of this manuscript. This work had the support of Portuguese national funds through Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I. P (FCT), under the projects UIDB/04292/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/04292/2020) and UIDP/04292/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDP/04292/2020) granted to MARE, and LA/P/0069/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/LA/P/0069/2020), granted to the Associate Laboratory ARNET, and transitory norm contracts (DL57/2016/CP1370/CT89) to ACN. The sampling in south Spain was economically supported by a grant of the Spanish Society for Ethology and Evolutionary Ecology, granted to MC. FJZC was partly supported by a Juan de la Cierva-Incorporación postdoctoral fellowship by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness. FCT supported LPS through the research contract CEECIND/02064/2017 (https://doi.org/10.54499/CEECIND/02064/2017/CP1423/CP1645/CT0009) and MAC through project 2022.03391. PTDC.







