Publication: Acumulación de capital, insuficiencia dinámica y crecimiento económico en América Latina
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2017
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales (ICEI)
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
En este artículo analizamos teórica y empíricamente la relación entre la insuficiencia dinámica (ID) (Prebisch, 1970; Avendaño & Perrotini, 2015) y la tasa de crecimiento consistente con el equilibrio de la balanza de pagos (gbp) (Thirlwall, 1979) para un conjunto de economías de América Latina durante el periodo 1977-2011. Nuestra hipótesis consiste en que la ID exacerba la restricción externa al crecimiento debido a la brecha entre la tasa natural de acumulación de capital y la tasa de crecimiento garantizada (kn>gw) ya que existe una relación de causalidad de kn ag. Esto significa que está determinada por condiciones de demanda y de oferta.
In this paper we analyse theoretically and empirically the relationship between dynamic insufficiency (DI) (Prebisch, 1970; Avendaño & Perrotini, 2015) and the growth rate consistent with balance of payments (gbp) equilibrium (Thirlwall, 1979) for a set of Latin American economies during the period 1977-2011. Our hypothesis is that DI exacerbates the external constraint on growth due to the gap between the natural rate of capital accumulation and the guaranteed growth rate (kn>gw) and that there is a causal relationship between and. This means that is determined by demand and supply conditions.
In this paper we analyse theoretically and empirically the relationship between dynamic insufficiency (DI) (Prebisch, 1970; Avendaño & Perrotini, 2015) and the growth rate consistent with balance of payments (gbp) equilibrium (Thirlwall, 1979) for a set of Latin American economies during the period 1977-2011. Our hypothesis is that DI exacerbates the external constraint on growth due to the gap between the natural rate of capital accumulation and the guaranteed growth rate (kn>gw) and that there is a causal relationship between and. This means that is determined by demand and supply conditions.
Description
UCM subjects
Keywords
Citation
Avendaño-Vargas, B. L. y Perrotini-Hernández, I. (2015): “Insuficiencia dinámica, crecimiento y desempleo en México, 1974-2012”, Revista Investigación Económica, vol. 74, núm. 293, 99-139.
Choi, I. (2001): “Unit Root Tests for Panel Data”, Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 20, núm.2, 249-272.
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, CEPALSTAT (2016), recuperado de http://estadisticas.cepal.org/cepalstat/WEB_CEPALSTAT/estadisticasIndicadores.asp?idioma=e>.
Fondo Monetario Internacional, World Development Indicators (2016), recuperado de <http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators>.
Granger, C. W. J. (1969): “Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods”, Econometrica, vol. 37, núm. 3, 424-438.
Groningen Growth and Development Centre, Penn World Table 8.1 (2016), recuperado de <http://www.rug.nl/ggdc/productivity/pwt/earlier-releases>.
Harrod, R. (1939): “An Essay in Dynamic Theory”, The Economic Journal, vol.49, núm. 193, 14-33.
Im, K. S, Pesaran M. H. y Shin, Y. (2003): “Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels”, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 115, núm. 1, 53-74.
International Labour Organization, Key Indicators of Labour Market (2016), recuperado de <http://www.ilo.org/global/statistics-and-databases/research-and-databases/kilm/lang--en/index.htm>.
Johansen, S. (1988): “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 12, núm. 2—3, 231-254.
Johansen, S. (1991): “Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models,” Econometrica, vol. 59, núm. 6, 1551-1580.
Johansen, S. (1995): Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kaldor, N. (1966):Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Larsson, R., Lyhagen, J. y Löthgren, M. (2001): “Likelihood-based Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels”, TheEconometrics Journal, vol. 4, núm.1, 109-142.
Levin, A., Lin, C. y Chu, C. J. (2002): “Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties”, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 108, núm.1,1-24.
Maddala, G. S. y Wu, S. (1999): “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and A New Simple Test”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 61, núm. S1, 631-652.
Pacheco-López, P. y Thirlwall, A. P. (2007): “Trade Liberalisation and the Trade Off between Growth and the Balance of Payments in Latin America”, International Review of Applied Economics, vol. 21, núm. 4, 469-490.
Palley, T. (2003): “Pitfalls in the theory of growth: an application to the balance of payments constrained growth model”, Review of Political Economy. vol. 15, núm. 1, 75-84.
Prebisch, R. (1962): “El desarrollo económico de la América Latina y algunos de sus principales problemas”,Boletín económico de América Latina, vol. 7, núm. 1, 5-63.
Prebisch, R. (1970):Transformación y desarrollo: la gran tarea de América Latina,Fondo de Cultura Económica, México.
Prebisch, R. (1981):Capitalismo Periférico: Crisis y Transformación,Fondo de Cultura Económica, México.
Setterfield, M. (2006): “Thirlwall’s law and Palley’s pitfalls: a reconsideration”, en Philip Arestis, John McCombie, y Roger Vickerman, (eds). Growth and Economic Development: Essays in Honour of A. P. Thirlwall, Edward Elgar, Reino Unido.
Shaikh, A. y Moudud, J. (2004): “Measuring Capacity Utilization in OECD Countries: A Cointegration Method”, Working Paper, núm. 415.
Thirlwall, A. P. (1979): “The Balance of Payments Constraint as an Explanation of International Growth Rate Differences”, Banca Nazionale de Lavoro Quarterly Review, vol. 32, núm. 128,429-438.
Thirlwall, A. P. (2003):La naturaleza del crecimiento económico. Un marco alternativa para comprender el desempeño de las naciones, Fondo de Cultura Económica México.