Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Biologic therapy in severe and refractory peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK). Multicenter study of 34 patients

dc.contributor.authorDomínguez Casas, Lucía C.
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Valle, David
dc.contributor.authorBlanco, Ricardo
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-03T07:57:51Z
dc.date.available2024-12-03T07:57:51Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-15
dc.description.abstractPurpose: We assessed the efficacy and safety of biologic therapy in severe and refractory Peripheral Ulcerative Keratitis (PUK). Design: Open-label multicenter study of biologic-treated patients with severe PUK refractory to conventional immunosuppressive drugs. Subjects: We studied 34 patients (44 affected eyes) (24 women/10 men; mean age, 55.26±17.4 years). PUK was associated with a well-defined condition in 29 of them (rheumatoid arthritis [n = 20], psoriatic arthritis [n = 2], inflammatory bowel disease [n = 2], Behçet disease [n = 1], granulomatosis with polyangiitis [n = 1], microscopic polyangiitis [n = 1], systemic lupus erythematosus [n = 1] and axial spondyloarthritis [n = 1]). Besides topical and oral systemic glucocorticoids, patients had received: methylprednisolone pulses [n = 9], and conventional immunosuppressive drugs, mainly methotrexate [n = 18], and leflunomide [n = 7]. Eleven patients had required ocular surgery prior to biologic therapy. Methods: Following biologic therapy, baseline main outcomes were compared with those found at 1st week, 1st and 6th months and 1st year. Main outcome measures: Efficacy and safety of biologic therapy. Efficacy was analyzed by the assessment of corneal inflammation (corneal thinning, central keratolysis and ocular perforation); other causes of ocular surface inflammation (scleritis, episcleritis); intraocular inflammation (uveitis); visual acuity and glucocorticoid sparing effect. Results: The first biologic agents used were anti-TNFα drugs (n = 25); adalimumab (n = 16), infliximab (n = 8), etanercept (n = 1), and non-TNFα agents (n = 9); rituximab (n = 7), tocilizumab (n = 1) belimumab (n = 1) and abatacept (n = 1). During the follow-up, switching to a second biologic agent was required in 12 of the 25 (48%) patients treated with anti-TNFα drugs. However, no switching was required in those undergoing biologic therapy different from anti-TNFα agents. The main outcome variables showed a rapid and maintained improvement after a mean follow-up of 23.7 ± 20 months. Major adverse effects were tachyphylaxis, relapsing respiratory infections, supraventricular tachycardia, pulmonary tuberculosis and death, one each. Conclusions: Biologic therapy is effective and relatively safe in patients with severe and refractory PUK. Non-anti-TNFα agents appear to be effective in these patients.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Inmunología, Oftalmología y ORL
dc.description.facultyFac. de Medicina
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.sponsorshipInstituto de Salud Carlos III
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationDominguez-Casas, L. C., Sánchez-Bilbao, L., Calvo-Río, V., Maíz, O., Blanco, A., Beltrán, E., Martínez-Costa, L., Demetrío-Pablo, R., Del Buergo, M. Á., Rubio-Romero, E., Díaz-Valle, D., Lopez-Gonzalez, R., García-Aparicio, Á. M., Mas, A. J., Vegas-Revenga, N., Castañeda, S., Hernández, J. L., González-Gay, M. A., & Blanco, R. (2020). Biologic therapy in severe and refractory peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK). Multicenter study of 34 patients. Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 50(4), 608–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.03.023
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.03.023
dc.identifier.essn1532-866X
dc.identifier.issn0049-0172
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.03.023
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017220300949
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/111926
dc.issue.number4
dc.journal.titleSemininars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final615
dc.page.initial608
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.projectIDRD08/0075
dc.relation.projectIDRD12/0009/0013
dc.relation.projectIDRD16/0012
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.cdu612.017
dc.subject.keywordAdalimumab
dc.subject.keywordAnti-TNF therapy
dc.subject.keywordBelimumabBiologic therapy in PUK
dc.subject.keywordCertolizumab
dc.subject.keywordEtanercept
dc.subject.keywordGolimumab
dc.subject.keywordInfliximab
dc.subject.keywordRituximab
dc.subject.keywordTocilizumab
dc.subject.ucmCiencias Biomédicas
dc.subject.unesco32 Ciencias Médicas
dc.titleBiologic therapy in severe and refractory peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK). Multicenter study of 34 patients
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number50
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication3e2b98e5-5c02-400b-8823-90887624c010
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3e2b98e5-5c02-400b-8823-90887624c010

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
sem arthritis rheum 2020.pdf
Size:
925.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections