Publication: Public participation in China and the West
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2022-11-01
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
This work shows differences in public participation in China and Western countries, conceptually and empirically. To do so, the different philosophical and public administration traditions are outlined. Main contributions are tables and dashboards to allow general comparisons and to differentiate contexts in both political settings, besides being useful for other settings. The tables included are: 1) Main features of context in China, 2) Deliberative democracy, 3) Main features of context in the west, 4) The Gil Dashboard helping to outline the endogenous foundations for change both in China and the West.
This work shows differences in public participation in China and Western countries, conceptually and empirically. To do so, the different philosophical and public administration traditions are outlined. Main contributions are tables and dashboards to allow general comparisons and to differentiate contexts in both political settings, besides being useful for other settings. The tables included are: 1) Main features of context in China, 2) Deliberative democracy, 3) Main features of context in the west, 4) The Gil Dashboard helping to outline the endogenous foundations for change both in China and the West.
This work shows differences in public participation in China and Western countries, conceptually and empirically. To do so, the different philosophical and public administration traditions are outlined. Main contributions are tables and dashboards to allow general comparisons and to differentiate contexts in both political settings, besides being useful for other settings. The tables included are: 1) Main features of context in China, 2) Deliberative democracy, 3) Main features of context in the west, 4) The Gil Dashboard helping to outline the endogenous foundations for change both in China and the West.
Description
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
Abellán, J., & Artacho, P. A. (2020). BUROCRACIA Y ADMINISTRACIÓN PÚBLICA. EL PARADIGMA BUROCRÁTICO Y EL PENSAMIENTO WEBERIANO. In Democracia, Gobierno y Administración Pública contemporánea (pp. 43-64). Tecnos.
Allwinkle, S., & Cruickshank, P. 2011. Creating smart-er cities: An overview. Journal of urban technology, 18(2), 1-16.
Carson, L.; Hartz-Karp, J. 2005. Adapting and Combining Deliberative Designs; Jossey Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 120–138.
Chambers, S. 2003. Deliberative democratic theory. Annu. Rev. Political. Vol 6, 307–326.
Conteh, C. 2012. Public management in an age of complexity: Regional economic development in Canada. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 25 (6), pp. 464-472, 10.1108/09513551211260649
Cortés-Cediel, M. E., Gil, O., & Cantador, I. (2018, May). Defining the engagement life cycle in e-participation. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age (pp. 1-2).
De Vries, Hanna, Victor Bekkers, and Lars Tummers. "Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda." Public administration 94.1 (2016): 146-166.
Drechsler, W. (2019). The Reality and Diversity of Buddhist Economics. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 78(2), 523-560.
Drechsler, W. (2016). The Reality and Diversity of Buddhist Economics (With Case Studies of Thailand, Bhutan and Yogyakarta) (No. 69). TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
Dryzek, J.S. 2002. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
Elstub, S., & Escobar, O. (2017, April). A typology of democratic innovations. In Political Studies Association’s Annual Conference.
Elstub, S. 2010. The third generation of deliberative democracy. Political Stud. Rev. 8, 291–307.
Fishkin, J. 2009. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
Fishkin, J. S., He, B., Luskin, R. C., & Siu, A. (2010). Deliberative democracy in an unlikely place: Deliberative polling in China. British Journal of Political Science, 40(2), 435-448.
Gastil, J.; Richards, R.C. 2016. Deliberation. In International Encyclopedia of Political Communication; Mazzoleni, G., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK.
Gil, O., Navío, J., & Pérez de Heredia, M. (2015). ¿ Cómo se gobiernan las ciudades? Ciudades inteligentes. Casos comparados: Shangái, Iskandar, ciudades en Japón, Nueva York, Ámsterdam, Málaga, Santander y Tarragona. Silva Editorial.
Greenhalgh, T.; Russell, 2009. J. Evidence-based policymaking: A critique. Perspect. Biol. Med. 52, 304–318.
Gutmann, A.; Thompson, D.F. 1998. Democracy and Disagreement; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
Fuguo, H. ; Jing, H.; Xu, Y. 2015. Making Democracy Practicable in China: The first Deliberative Polling on Urban Governance in Shanghai. The Paper. Accessed on March 20th 2019, at: http://cdd.stanford.edu/mm/2015/10/thepaper-shanghai.pdf
Gil, O., Cortés-Cediel, M. E., & Cantador, I. (2019). Citizen Participation and the Rise of Digital Media Platforms in Smart Governance and Smart Cities. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 8(1), 19-34.
Hartz-Karp, J.; Carson, L.; Briand, M. 2018. Deliberative democracy as a reform movement. In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy; Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J.S., Mansbridge, J., Warren, M., Eds.; Oxford University. Press: Oxford, UK.
He, Baogang. (2011). Civic engagement through participatory budgeting in China: Three different logics at work. Public Administration and Development, 31(2), 122-133.
Hsiao, C. H., & Yang, C. 2011. The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: A co-citation analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 31(2), 128-136.
Jing, Y., & Osborne, S. P. (2017). Public service innovations in china: An introduction. In Public Service Innovations in China (pp. 1-24). Palgrave, Singapore
Juliani, F., & de Oliveira, O. J. 2016. State of research on public service management: Identifying scientific gaps from a bibliometric study. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1033-1041.
Jing, Y., & Osborne, S. P. (2017). Public service innovations in china: An introduction. In Public Service Innovations in China(pp. 1-24). Palgrave, Singapore.
Jun, Jong S. (2012). Social Construction of Public Administration, The: Interpretive and Critical Perspectives. SUNY Press.
Kenny, A., 2010. A new history of Western philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Komninos, Nicos. 2009. Intelligent cities: towards interactive and global innovation environments. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development. 1 (4) 337-355.
Komninos, Nicos. 2009. "Intelligent cities: towards interactive and global innovation environments". International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development (Inderscience Publishers). 337–355.
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O'Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation science, 5(1), 69.
Li, W., Liu, J., & Li, D. (2012). Getting their voices heard: Three cases of public participation in environmental protection in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 98, 65-72.
Lin, Y. 2018. A comparison of selected Western and Chinese smart governance: the application of ICT in governmental management, participation and collaboration. Telecommunications Policy. 42. p. 800-809.
Liu, P., & Peng, Z. (2013). Smart cities in China. IEEE Computer Society, 16, 7.
Lu, J., & Shi, T. (2015). The battle of ideas and discourses before democratic transition: Different democratic conceptions in authoritarian China. International Political Science Review, 36(1), 20-41.
Mansbridge, J.; Bohman, J.; Chambers, S.; Christiano, T.; Fung, A.; Parkinson, J.; Thompson, D.F.; Warren, M.E. 2012. A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In Deliberative Systems; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, pp. 1–26.
Mittelstaedt, Jean Christopher. 15th December, 2017. New era between continuity and disruption.
retrieved March 21rs, 2019 at: https://www.ecfr.eu/publications/summary/chinas_new_era_with_xi_jinping_characteristics7243
Nabatchi, T.; Gastil, J.; Leighninger, M.; Weiksner, G.M. 2012. Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. 2011, September. Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance (pp. 185-194). ACM.
Ongaro , E. 2018, Philosophy and Public Administration. An Introduction. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ongaro, Edoardo., & Van Thiel, Sandra. (Eds.). (2018). The Palgrave handbook of public administration and management in Europe. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pollitt, Christopher. (Ed.). (2013). Context in public policy and management: The missing link?. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pollitt, Christopher, & Bouckaert, Geert. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-into the age of austerity. Oxford University Press.
Riva Sanseverino, E. Riva Sanseverino, R., Anello, E. 2018. A Cross-Reading Approach to Smart City: A European Perspective of Chinese Smart Cities. Smart Cities 2018, 1, 26–52.
Rodriguez, Exequiel and Long, Federico. 2018. “Laboratorios de innovación: burocracia y sociedad frente al fenómeno de la experimentación en el sector público. Comparando experiencias de ambos lados del Atlántico” VI Congreso Internacional sobre Democracia organizado por la facultad de Ciencia Política y relaciones Internacionales de la Universidad de Rosario. Rosario, 10-13 septiembre 2018.
Rubio, R. 2018 “La participación del ciudadano en la Administración Ge-
neral del Estado” Participación ciudadana: Experiencias inspiradoras en España. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales
Thompson, D.F. 2008. Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 11, 497–520.
Tong, D., & He, B. (2018). How democratic are Chinese grassroots deliberations? An empirical study of 393 deliberation experiments in China. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 19(4), 630-642.
Shan, X. Z. (2012). Attitude and willingness toward participation in decision-making of urban green spaces in China. Urban forestry & urban greening, 11(2), 211-217.
Tang, B. S., Wong, S. W., & Lau, M. C. H. (2008). Social impact assessment and public participation in China: A case study of land requisition in Guangzhou. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(1), 57-72.
Webler, T., & Tuler, S. (2008). Organizing a Deliberative Participatory Process: What Does the Science Say?. REFORM, 125.
Weymouth, R., and Hartz-Karp, J. 2018. Principles for Integrating the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals in Cities. Urban Science. 2018, 2, 77; doi:10.3390/urbansci2030077
Xie, L. L., Xia, B., Hu, Y., Shan, M., Le, Y., & Chan, A. P. (2017). Public participation performance in public construction projects of South China: A case study of the Guangzhou Games venues construction. International Journal of Project Management, 35(7), 1391-1401.
Yang, S. (2008). Public participation in the Chinese environmental impact assessment (EIA) system. Journal of environmental assessment policy and management, 10(01), 91-113.
Zhou, Y., Hou, L., Yang, Y., Chong, H. Y., & Moon, S. (2019). A comparative review and framework development on public participation for decision-making in Chinese public projects. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 75, 79-87.
Original sources
China Academy of Information and Communications Technology. 2014. Comparative Study of Smart Cities in Europe and China 2014. London: Springer.
Eight point regulation. Retrived March 13th 2019 at http://cpcchina.chinadaily.com.cn/2012-12/05/content_15992256.htm
General Office of the Central Committee of the CPC and General Office of the State (China)
http://www.gov.cn/english/official/2006-07/28/content_349139.htm
UNDP China (2017). Smart Cities and Social Governance: Guide for Participatory Indicator Development. United Nations Development Programme in China, Beijing, China.
Xinhua, 2018. CPC meeting underlines core status of Xi. December 27. Retrived March 13th 2019 at http://www.china.org.cn/china/2018-12/27/content_74316540.htm