Publication: Multiple channels for horizontal, but only one for vertical corrugations? A new look at the stereo anisotropy.
Full text at PDC
Advisors (or tutors)
Stereo vision displays a well-known anisotropy: disparity-defined slant is easier to detect for rotations about a horizontal axis than about a vertical axis, and low-frequency sinusoidal depth corrugations are easier to detect when the corrugations are horizontal than when they are vertical. Here, we determined disparity thresholds for vertically and horizontally oriented depth corrugations with both sinusoidal and square-wave profiles. We found that the orientation anisotropy for square waves is much weaker than for sine waves and is almost independent of frequency. This weaker anisotropy for square waves can be explained by considering the Fourier harmonics present in the stimulus. Using linear models imported from the luminance and texture perception domain, the disparity thresholds for square waves can be very well predicted from those for sine waves, for both horizontally and vertically oriented corrugations. For horizontally oriented corrugations, models based on the root mean square of the output of a single linear channel or the output of multiple linear channels worked equally well. This is consistent with previous evidence suggesting that stereo vision has multiple channels tuned to different spatial frequencies of horizontally oriented disparity modulations. However, for vertically oriented corrugations, only the root mean squared output of a single linear channel explained the data. We suggest that the stereo anisotropy may arise because the stereo system possesses multiple spatial frequency channels for detecting horizontally oriented modulations in horizontal disparity, but only one for vertically oriented modulations.
Anderson, A. J. (2003). Utility of a dynamic termination criterion in the ZEST adaptive threshold method. Vision Research, 43, 165–170. Bradshaw, M. F., Hibbard, P. B., Parton, A. D., Rose, D., & Langley, K. (2006). Surface orientation, modulation frequency and the detection and perception of depth defined by binocular disparity and motion parallax. Vision Research, 46, 2636–2644. Bradshaw, M. F., & Rogers, B. J. (1999). Sensitivity to horizontal and vertical corrugations defined by binocular disparity. Vision Research, 39, 3049–3056. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. Campbell, F. W., & Robson, J. G. (1968). Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. The Journal of Physiology, 197, 551–566. Cobo-Lewis, A. B., & Yeh, Y. (1994). Selectivity of cyclopean masking for the spatial frequency of binocular disparity modulation. Vision Research, 34, 607–620. Emerson, P. L. (1986). Observations on maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods of forced-choice sequential threshold estimation. Perception & Psychophysics, 39, 151–153. García-Pérez, M. A. (1998). Forced-choice staircases with fixed steps sizes: Asymptotic and small-sample properties. Vision Research, 38, 1861–1881. Kingdom, F. A. A., & Keeble, D. R. T. (1996). A linear systems approach to the detection of both abrupt and smooth spatial variations in orientation-defined textures. Vision Research, 36, 409–420. King-Smith, P. E., Grigsby, S. S., Vingrys, A. J., Benes, S. C., & Supowit, A. (1994). Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision Research, 34, 885–912. Lee, B., & Rogers, B. J. (1997). Disparity modulation sensitivity for narrow-band-filtered stereograms. Vision Research, 37, 1769–1777. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. Pentland, A. (1980). Maximum likelihood estimation: The best PEST. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 377–379. Rogers, B. J., & Graham, M. E. (1982). Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception. Vision Research, 22, 261–270. Schumer, R., & Ganz, L. (1979). Independent stereoscopic channels for different extents of spatial pooling. Vision Research, 19, 1303–1314. Serrano-Pedraza, I., & Read, J. C. A. (2009a). Horizontal/ vertical anisotropy in sensitivity to relative disparity depends on stimulus depth structure. Perception, 38, 155. Serrano-Pedraza, I., & Read, J. C. A. (2009b). Stereo vision requires an explicit encoding of vertical disparity. Journal of Vision, 9(4):3, http://www.journalofvision. org/content/9/4/3, doi:10.1167/9.4.3. [PubMed] [Article] Treutwein, B. (1995). Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Research, 35, 2503–2522. Tyler, C. W. (1974). Depth perception in disparity gratings. Nature, 251, 140–142. Tyler, C. W. (1975). Stereoscopic tilt and size aftereffects. Perception, 4, 187–192. Tyler, C. W. (1991). Cyclopean vision. In D. Regan (Ed.), Vision and visual dysfunction, binocular vision (vol. 9, pp. 38–74). London: Macmillan. Tyler, C. W., & Raibert, M. (1975). Generation of random-dot stereogratings. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 7, 37–41. van der Willigen, R. F., Harmening, W. M., Vossen, S., & Wagner, H. (2010). Disparity sensitivity in man and owl: Psychophysical evidence for equivalent perception of shape-from-stereo. Journal of Vision, 10(1):10, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/1/10, doi:10.1167/10.1.10. [PubMed] [Article]