Person:
Lombardo, Emanuela

First Name

Emanuela

Last Name

Lombardo

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/75964

Affiliation

Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Faculty / Institute

Ciencias Políticas y Sociología

Department

Ciencia Política y de la Administración

Area

Ciencia Política y de la Administración

Identifiers

Full item page

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 22

Cuotas de género en política y economía: Regulación y configuración institucional en España
(Política y gobierno, 2017) Lombardo, Emanuela; Verge, Tania
Las cuotas de género en la política y en los consejos de administración de las empresas presentan diferencias importantes en España respecto al grado de coerción, el periodo de implementación establecido y las sanciones por incumplimiento, indicando una regulación “fuerte” para las primeras y “débil” para las segundas. Para explicar por qué se introdujeron enfoques regulativos diferentes, adoptamos un enfoque feminista institucionalista que nos permite analizar la distinta configuración institucional subyacente a los sucesivos procesos de reforma de estas cuotas, así como las estrategias discursivas de los actores clave que apoyaron o se opusieron a su adopción. Mientras que las cuotas en la política siguieron una secuencia armónica, en las empresas la secuencia fue claramente conflictiva.
Gender quotas, gender mainstreaming and gender relations in politics
(Political Science, 2013) Meier, Petra; Lombardo, Emanuela
This article seeks to reintroduce discussions on gender relations in politics back into scholarly and political debate. Many countries have adopted gender quotas, but it is unclear whether their implementation has meaningfully changed the prevalent inequalities governing gender relations in politics. This article considers whether the implementation of gender quotas could promote change, and assesses this change with reference to five criteria formerly used to assess the strategy of gender mainstreaming. These are a shift towards a more comprehensive concept of gender equality; the incorporation of a gender perspective intersected with other inequalities in mainstream politics; equal political representation; organizational changes in selection and recruitment mechanisms as well as the functioning of politics; and, finally, the displacement of hierarchies, and the empowerment of subjects. Reflection on and empirical illustrations of gender quotas with regard to these criteria reveal a mixed picture, demonstrating the need to reintroduce discussions about gender equality within politics back into gender quota debates. This discussion will not focus on the legitimacy of or need for gender quotas, but on how their implementation can contribute to the improvement of gender relations in politics beyond a quantitative sense. Approaching gender quotas through the use of criteria devised for assessing the gender mainstreaming strategy is helpful in exploring the potential of gender quotas in the transformation of gender relations.
Feminist political analysis: Exploring strengths, hegemonies and limitations
(Feminist Theory, 2017) Lombardo, Emanuela; Kantola, Johanna
Austerity politics, war in the Middle East and at other borders of the European Union, the rise of nationalisms, the emergence of populist parties and politicians, Islamophobia and the refugee crisis are amongst the recent developments suggesting the need for discussions about the theories and concepts that academic disciplines provide for making sense of societal, cultural and political transformations. In this article, we focus on the capacities of feminist political theories to undertake this task. By assessing different feminist approaches to political analysis that range from focusing on women and men, to analysing gender, to doing intersectionality and to adopting post-structural and new materialist approaches, we explore the contributions and the limitations of each framework. This allows us to consider where feminist theoretical debates on gender and politics currently are, to assess old and new developments and to address lacunae in the debate. Our argument is that dominant approaches in political science influence the emergence and marginalisation of particular feminist frameworks for political analysis, but also that feminist theorising of gender and politics, in striving for recognition within mainstream political science, reproduces its own hegemonies and marginalisations.
European Integration and Disintegration: Feminist Perspectives on Inequalities and Social Justice
(Journal of Common Market Studies, 2019) Lombardo, Emanuela; Kantola, Johanna
Resistance to implementing gender mainstreaming in EU research policy
(European Integration online Papers, 2014) Mergaert, Lut; Lombardo, Emanuela
In this article, we analyze the implementation of gender mainstreaming in the European Union (EU) through the study of ‘resistance’ to gender equality initiatives in EU research policy. Contributing to feminist institutionalist theories, we identify resistance to gender initiatives within the Directorate General Research and Innovation, showing that there have been obstacles to an effective implementation of gender mainstreaming in the European Commission’s 6th Framework Programme (FP6). We argue that the encountered resistances reveal tensions between the European Commission’s official mandate of mainstreaming gender equality into all policies and its actual implementation, which results in the ‘filtering out’ of transformative gender equality goals
Project number: 260
Planificación docente, semipresencialidad, nuevos métodos y técnicas para la virtualización de la docencia
(2018) Polo Villar, César; Carrillo Barroso, Ernesto Javier; Bustelo Ruesta, María Dolores; Gutiérrez Díaz, Eduardo; Lombardo, Emanuela; López Sánchez, Eliseo Rafael; Llorente Márquez, Jesús; Martínez González, Ana María; Pérez Guerrero, Pedro Luis; Tamayo Saez, Manuel; Velasco González, María
El presente proyecto pretende aprovechar el esfuerzo realizado en el proyecto refª 188 que presentamos con el mismo título en la convocatoria 2016-17. Dicho proyecto nos ha permitido adoptar una concepción más precisa del concepto de semipresencialidad y su vinculación con las nuevas tecnologías (b-learning), y la percepción de las oportunidades, y también de los límites estructurales, que presenta su desarrollo en el marco de la materia "Políticas Públicas", y de las asignaturas en las que se despliega esta materia en las distintas titulaciones de Grado y Postgrado en las que participan los profesores investigadores y los profesores colaboradores que suscriben esta propuesta. De esta forma, la propuesta parte del diagnóstico elaborado con las conclusiones del proyecto 188, y se centra en objetivos ya muy concretos, relativos a los siguientes elementos: - Apoyo en experiencias exitosas (Instituto Ortega y Gasset / Universidad de Vigo) - Aplicación conocimientos sobre instrumentos metodológicos adquiridos en el proyecto anterior: "Prototipar" (Fase del método de learning by doing de TEAMLABS) - Identificación del grupo de referencia idóneo (número de alumnos / gestión compartida por varios profesores para superar la masificación) - Definición de la secuencia idónea entre actividad presencial y trabajo en línea: Guía docente - Estrategia de articulación teoría / prácticas: Consolidación de un programa común - Construcción de materiales didácticos (formatos, ubicación en la plataforma virtual, enlaces web, etc.) - Gestión de materiales didácticos: Referencias bibliográficas, materiales audiovisuales (incorporación de la Biblioteca de la Facultad de Ciencias Políticas al Proyecto) - Socialización de una guía metodológica para el diseño y realización de las actividades prácticas: Memorandum - Exploración de vías de promoción de la igualdad e integración en el proceso enseñanza-aprendizaje - Expediente "0" papeles: La plataforma virtual como gestor de las interacciones propias del proceso enseñanza aprendizaje. - Explorar la posible internacionalización de la docencia semipresencial en la materia de Políticas Públicas: Posibilidad de incorporar materiales en inglés en distintos formatos).
Towards equal sharing of care? Judicial implementation of EU equal employment and work–life balance policies in Spain
(Policy and Society, 2019) La Barbera, MariaCaterina; Lombardo, Emanuela
Discursive factors have not figured prominently in implementation research. This article fills this gap by addressing the material and discursive conflicts articulated around equality at workplace between women and men in multilevel judicial contexts. It studies obstacles to and opportunities for the judicial implementation of EU equal employment policies in Spain by analyzing two cases of parental rights to childcare litigated before Spanish and supranational courts, namely the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights. The claimants are working parents who litigate for the recognition of their right to provide childcare. In judicial implementation multiple meanings about women, gender and intersectionality can be articulated and counteracted at different levels. Frame analysis of selected judicial documents and content analysis of legal proceedings and interviews show that simultaneous favorable institutions, framing, and actors are needed for implementing EU equal employment policies in a way that allows overcoming the gendered division of care and paid work. Distinguishing among ‘women’, ‘gender’ and ‘intersectionality’ approaches, we assess the extent to which the result of judicial implementation is the transformation of gender roles towards equal sharing of care.
Intersectionality in European Union policymaking: the case of gender-based violence
(Political Studies, 2016) Lombardo, Emanuela; Rolandsen Agustín, Lise
Inclusiveness of different social groups and responsiveness to the needs of increasingly diverse societies are key criteria for policy analysts to assess the quality of public policies. We argue that an intersectional approach attentive to the interaction of gender with other inequalities is particularly apt to deal with equality and diversity in policymaking. By analysing a selection of European Union policy documents on gender-based violence in the period 2000–2014, we attend to the question of what intersectionality can bring to policymaking in terms of strengthening inclusiveness and address the methodological question of applying an intersectional approach to policy analysis.
Care policies in practice: how discourse matters for policy implementation
(Policy and Society, 2019) Ciccia, Rosella; Lombardo, Emanuela
This article puts public policy research in dialogue with gender and politics studies to enhance our understanding of the implementation of care policies. Care policies present interesting problems of implementation because of the multiplicity of aims, values, inequalities, actors and levels of governance involved. Nonetheless, previous research shows two important gaps: 1) the neglect of discursive factors in studies of implementation; and 2) the lack of attention to implementation processes in the analysis of care policies. This article suggests a general framework to address these issues which considers discourse as a transversal factor connecting actors and institutions engaged in policy implementation. The articles in this special issue demonstrate that including discourses in the analysis of care policy implementation makes visible the influence of gender+ norms and the dynamic and contentious processes surrounding them in a variety of institutional arenas, levels, and national contexts.
The Significance of Symbolic Representation for Gender Issues in Politics
(NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 2019) Lombardo, Emanuela; Meier, Petra
This article argues that many empirical studies in the field of gender and politics reduce symbolic representation to an effect of descriptive representation, which limits our understanding of the relevance of symbolic representation. We claim that we should understand symbolic representation as a dimension in itself, not merely as an effect of another dimension of political representation. In this article we develop this argument showing how symbolic representation presents constituents at the symbolic level, thereby generating dynamics of exclusion similar to the other dimensions of political representation. The relation between the different dimensions of symbolic representation is not unilateral in that symbolic representation is an effect of descriptive representation. The different dimensions are rather entangled in that they are mutually constitutive. We show how symbolic representation provides for a symbolic subtext enabling or constraining the political standing and acting for women—or other social groups. In order to develop our argument we return to Hanna Pitkin’s definition of symbolic representation, and then elaborate upon it relying on Michael Saward’s more recent conceptualization of political representation, also considering the constructivist turn in representation studies.