Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

Pressure release technique versus placebo applied to cervical and masticatory muscles in patients with chronic painful myofascial temporomandibular disorder: A randomised clinical trial

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Full text at PDC

Publication date

2023

Advisors (or tutors)

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley Online Library
Citations
Google Scholar

Citation

Serrano‐Hernanz, G.; Angulo‐Carrere, T.; Ardizone‐García, I.; Svensson, P.; Álvarez‐Méndez, A.M. Pressure Release Technique versus Placebo Applied to Cervical and Masticatory Muscles in Patients with Chronic Painful Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorder: A Randomised Clinical Trial. J of Oral Rehabilitation 2023, 50, 782–791, doi:10.1111/joor.13490.

Abstract

Background: The therapeutic approach to myofascial TMD should focus on pain relief and rehabilitation of function. Objective: This study investigated whether pressure release technique (PRT) is effec- tive for reducing pain in people with chronic myofascial temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Methods: A single-blinded randomised parallel-group trial, with 3 months follow-up was conducted. A total of 72 patients were randomly allocated to receive PRT or sham PRT. Primary outcome was pain assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), range of opening of the mouth (ROM), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), State–Trait Anxiety Index (STAI) and State– Trait Depression Index (ST-DEP). All parameters were assessed at baseline, at the end of the treatment and at 3 months follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA. Results: There were significant main effects of time, group and interaction between time and group (F ≥ 21.92; p < .001) on VAS pain. Post hoc tests showed a significant reduction in VAS pain scores in the PRT group (≥31.9%; p < .001). Effect sizes were moderate in the PRT group at all follow-up periods (≥1.25 Cohen's d). Also, there were significant effects of time in secondary outcomes (F ≥ 9.65; p < .001), and there were also interactions between time and group (F ≥ 3.82; p < .002) with better effects in the PRT group. Conclusions: The inclusion of PRT to conventional management with occlusal splints and self-care management appears to be effective to improve self-reported levels of pain in patients with chronic myofascial TMD pain. Retrospectively registered (Clini calTrials.gov: NCT03619889).

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Description

Keywords

Collections