Influence of different cleaning procedures on the shear bond strength of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate-containing self-adhesive resin cement to saliva contaminated zirconia

dc.contributor.authorMartínez Rus, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Christian
dc.contributor.authorSalido Rodríguez-Manzaneque, María Paz
dc.contributor.authorPradíes Ramiro, Guillermo Jesús
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-02T11:49:19Z
dc.date.available2025-12-02T11:49:19Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-14
dc.description.abstractPurpose To evaluate the effect of different cleaning methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-containing self-adhesive resin cement to zirconia after saliva contamination. Methods Sixty zirconia specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n=15) according to treatment surface. Except for the control group, all samples were contaminated with saliva and were then rinsed with water-spray and air-dried. Subsequently, the specimens were either treated with a cleaning paste (CP), with argon plasma (AP), or did not undergo an additional cleaning process (WS). An MDP-containing self-adhesive resin cement was applied onto the ceramic surfaces. Specimens were stored in water (24 hours) followed by thermocycling (5°C to 55°C for 10.000 cycles). SBS tests were performed in a universal testing machine, and the results (MPa ± SD) were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test. Fractured surfaces were examined to identify the failure types using a stereomicroscopy and SEM. Results The surface cleaning treatment (p<0.05) significantly affected the results. The highest SBS values were observed in the control group (12.16 ± 1.22 MPa) and were statistically comparable to values for the CP group (11.38 ± 1.65 MPa). The AP group (9.17 ± 1.06 MPa) showed significantly higher bond strength than the WS group (6.95 ± 1.20 MPa), but it showed significantly lower strength than the control and CP groups. Conclusions The CP application was the most effective method in removing saliva contamination. The AP treatment could not restore the SBS to the same level as uncontaminated specimens.
dc.description.departmentDepto. de Odontología Conservadora y Prótesis
dc.description.facultyFac. de Odontología
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.identifier.citationMartínez-Rus F, Rodríguez C, Salido MP, Pradíes G. Influence of different cleaning procedures on the shear bond strength of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate-containing self-adhesive resin cement to saliva contaminated zirconia. J Prosthodont Res. 2021 Oct 15;65(4):443-448. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00157
dc.identifier.doi10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00157
dc.identifier.essn2212-4632
dc.identifier.issn1883-1958
dc.identifier.officialurlhttps://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00157
dc.identifier.pmid33441505
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpr/65/4/65_JPR_D_20_00157/_article
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33441505/
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/128310
dc.issue.number4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Prosthodontic Research
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final448
dc.page.initial443
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.cdu615.46
dc.subject.cdu546.831
dc.subject.keywordArgon plasma treatment
dc.subject.keywordCleaning paste
dc.subject.keywordSaliva contamination
dc.subject.keywordShear bond strength
dc.subject.keywordY-TZP
dc.subject.ucmOdontología (Odontología)
dc.subject.ucmMateriales dentales
dc.subject.unesco3213.13 Ortodoncia-Estomatología
dc.titleInfluence of different cleaning procedures on the shear bond strength of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate-containing self-adhesive resin cement to saliva contaminated zirconia
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number65
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationeddef645-1a65-4096-8122-07150050e03c
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc6f6ec8c-105a-4334-a0e1-9404f1e769b8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1f9c3f08-3382-454f-8c0e-b5de6a5d271b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryeddef645-1a65-4096-8122-07150050e03c

Download

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
J Prosthodont Res. 2021 Oct 15;65(4):443-448.pdf
Size:
1.17 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections