El resto, la cosa y lo incondicionado: Schelling con Lacan
Loading...
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2017
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Citation
Carrasco Conde A. (2017): "El resto, la cosa y lo incondicionado: Schelling con Lacan, en Logos. Anales del Seminario de Metafísica, 50, 53-64. https://doi.org/10.5209/ASEM.56827
Abstract
A partir del conocido pasaje del Vom Ich de F.W.J. Schelling (“condicionar significa la acción a través de la cual algo deviene cosa”) el texto propone una lectura del conocido como “resto irreductible” para dar cuenta del terror y de sus mecanismos de control. Se propone, en crítica a lo que Žižek hace con Hegel, una lectura lacaniana de Schelling que muestra, hasta qué punto, el “Hegel” presentado por Žižek no solo es un Hegel pasado por Lacan, sino también por Schelling.
From the known passage of F.W.J Schelling’s Vom Ich (“Bedingen [to condition] names the operation in which something becomes a Ding [thing]”) the text proposes a reading of the concept known as “irreducible remainder” to explain the terror and of its mechanisms of control. It is proposed, criticizing what Žižek does with Hegel, a lacanian reading of Schelling that shows how far the “Hegel” presented by Žižek is not only a Hegel through Lacan, but also through Schelling.
From the known passage of F.W.J Schelling’s Vom Ich (“Bedingen [to condition] names the operation in which something becomes a Ding [thing]”) the text proposes a reading of the concept known as “irreducible remainder” to explain the terror and of its mechanisms of control. It is proposed, criticizing what Žižek does with Hegel, a lacanian reading of Schelling that shows how far the “Hegel” presented by Žižek is not only a Hegel through Lacan, but also through Schelling.