La confusión populista: problemas conceptuales y sesgos ideológicos
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2021
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Instituto de Estudios Sociales y Avanzados ( CSIC)
Citation
Abstract
Esta nota bibliográfica ofrece una revisión crítica de tres contribuciones recientes al estudio del populismo: ¿Qué es el populismo? de J. W. Müller, La explosión populista de J. B. Judis y Populismo: una breve introducción de C. Mudde y C. Rovira Kaltwasser. Los tres trabajos parten de perspectivas parcialmente divergentes, por lo que proporcionan una panorámica apropiada para su discusión conjunta en torno a los problemas conceptuales y los sesgos ideológicos que acompañan al uso del término ‘populismo’. En la nota se defiende que, de cara a esquivar estos problemas, es más apropiado entender el populismo como un simple marco discursivo, en lugar de como una ideología que representa un peligro para la democracia liberal.
This book review offers a critical assessment of three recent contributions to the debate on populism: What is Populism? by J. W. Müller, The Populist Explosion by J. B. Judis and Populism: A Brief Introduction by C. Mudde and C. Rovira Kaltwasser. The three works depart from different approaches, thus offering an appropriate picture for their joint discussion around the conceptual problems and the ideological biases connected to the uses of the term “populism”. It is argued that in order to avoid these flaws, it is more appropriate to conceive populism as a modest discursive frame rather than as an ideology that represents a threat to liberal democracy.
This book review offers a critical assessment of three recent contributions to the debate on populism: What is Populism? by J. W. Müller, The Populist Explosion by J. B. Judis and Populism: A Brief Introduction by C. Mudde and C. Rovira Kaltwasser. The three works depart from different approaches, thus offering an appropriate picture for their joint discussion around the conceptual problems and the ideological biases connected to the uses of the term “populism”. It is argued that in order to avoid these flaws, it is more appropriate to conceive populism as a modest discursive frame rather than as an ideology that represents a threat to liberal democracy.