Publication:
Learning in the laboratory: experiences in an hybrid between the expository and the inquiry laboratories

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2013
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
International Academy of Technology, Education and Development (IATED),
Citations
Google Scholar
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
There are distinct styles of laboratory instructions in chemistry education which can be applied to biology: expository, inquiry, discovery, and more recently, problem-based. This work is focused in a hybrid type between the expository and the inquiry laboratories. The process consists of two phases: - First, learners were trained in an expository laboratory. All the students at the first course participate in this training. Within this learning environment, the instructor defines the topic,relates it to previous work, and directs students’ action. - Later some students voluntarily participate in the inquiry laboratory. Inquiry-based activities are inductive. They have an undetermined outcome and require the learners to generate their own procedures. They are more student-centred, contain less direction, and give the student more responsibility for determining procedural options than the traditional format. The aims (as general statements of what the teacher intends to achieve), and the objectives (as specific statements of what the students should be able to accomplish as a result of being taught in the laboratory) of this “hybrid” laboratory were analyzed and discussed.
Description
INTED2013: 7th International Technology, Education and Development Conference
Keywords
Citation
[1] Johnstone A.H. and Al-Shuaili A. (2001). Learning in the laboratory; some thoughts from the literature. U.Chem.Ed. 5, pp. 42-51. [2] Buckley J.G. and Kempa R.F. (1971). School Science Review 53(182), p 24. [3] Kerr, J.F. (1963). Practical work in school science: An account of an inquiry into the nature and purpose of practical work in school science teaching in England and Wales, Leicester University Press, Leicester. [4] Gardner P. and Gauld, C. (1990). In: The student laboratory and the science curriculum, Ed: E. Hegarty-Hazel, Routledge, London. [5] Garnett P.J. and Hackling M.W. (1995). Australian Science Teachers’ Journal 41(2), pp 26.0307