Análisis del impacto clínico de la reclasificación diagnóstica de gliomas cerebrales según la clasificación de la organización mundial de la salud (2016)

Citation

Mateo-Sierra O, Alcalá-Torres J, Serret-De Troya C, Valera-Melé M, Solá-Vendrell E. Análisis del impacto clínico de la reclasificación diagnóstica de gliomas cerebrales según la clasificación de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (2016) [Analysis of the clinical impact of the diagnostic reclassification of brain gliomas according to the World Health Organization classification (2016)]. Rev Neurol. 2019 Nov 16;69(10):402-408. Spanish. doi: 10.33588/rn.6910.2019256. PMID: 31713226

Abstract

Introduction: Since the introduction of genetic and molecular criteria in the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of brain tumours, there has been a diagnostic reclassification between certain astrocytomas and oligodendro-gliomas with histological and genetic discordances, the prognosis of which is unknown. Aim: To analyse the implications of the diagnostic reclassification of brain gliomas according to the 2016 WHO criteria, especially depending on isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 1p19q codeletion. Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of gliomas treated from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2016, with analyses of clinicoradiological aspects and prognoses, and with available and complete follow-up until 31 March 2019. Results: From a total of 147 brain gliomas, a molecular diagnosis and a diagnostic re-evaluation were carried out in 69 cases (grade II-IV astrocytomas or oligodendrogliomas). Twenty-four reclassified gliomas were detected, usually oligodendro-gliomas that became astrocytomas, and which showed greater survival, derived from their not being classified as grade IV. The reclassified gliomas, all grades II/III, mostly began with seizures, without focus, with single lesions, < 17 cm3 and with oedema, although with similar survival rates. The prognostic factors were: young age, focus, grade II and no contrast enhancement or necrosis, or multiplicity. No variations were detected according to the molecular pattern with IDH mutation or codeletion. Conclusion: The changes in diagnosis after the WHO classification of 2016 present specific clinical-radiological characteristics in this series, but no greater survival, although, due to the habitual survival in these cases, they would require a longer follow-up time.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Description

Unesco subjects

Keywords

Collections