Discriminación múltiple e inmigración: huellas de discurso institucional, académico y de la población
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2017
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas
Citations
Exportar
Citation
Abstract
Este artículo enfoca el binomio discriminación múltiple e inmigración, explorando el rastro documental dejado en ámbitos político-institucionales, académicos y en las hablas de población general. Se documenta la triple huella discursiva (institucional, académica, poblacional) del concepto. Hallazgos principales: 1) mayor uso del adjetivo "múltiple" en la literatura político-jurídica sobre discriminación, siendo más latente en la sociológica; 2) presencia de formas de discriminación múltiple en el lenguaje institucional, académico y poblacional (no siempre explícitas); 3) las estadísticas y encuestas disponibles no captan la complejidad del fenómeno sociológico, socio-jurídico, precisándose materiales cualitativos también (discursivo-conversacionales primarios de población nativa o inmigrada, y discursivo-documentales elaborados desde instituciones o la academia).
This article focus on the pairing multiple discrimination and immigration, exploring documentation left in political-institutional grounds, academia and people speech. A triple discursive trace is documented (institutional, academic, populational). Main results are: 1) greater use of adjective “multiple” within political-legal literature on discrimination, being more latent within sociological research; 2) the presence of multiple discrimination forms in institutional, academic and general population language (not always explicitly) ; 3) available statistics and surveys do not record the complexity of a sociological and social-legal phenomenon, requering qualitative materials as well (conversational primary discourses from native or immigrant population, and documentary elaborated discourses from institutions or academia).
This article focus on the pairing multiple discrimination and immigration, exploring documentation left in political-institutional grounds, academia and people speech. A triple discursive trace is documented (institutional, academic, populational). Main results are: 1) greater use of adjective “multiple” within political-legal literature on discrimination, being more latent within sociological research; 2) the presence of multiple discrimination forms in institutional, academic and general population language (not always explicitly) ; 3) available statistics and surveys do not record the complexity of a sociological and social-legal phenomenon, requering qualitative materials as well (conversational primary discourses from native or immigrant population, and documentary elaborated discourses from institutions or academia).