Variables reportadas por los pacientes tras el tratamiento quirúrgico de la periimplantitis: resultados de un estudio clínico aleatorizado multicéntrico.
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2022
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citation
Abstract
Objetivo: Describir las variables reportadas por el paciente (PROMS), después del tratamiento quirúrgico de la periimplantitis y comparar si hay alguna diferencia en dichas variables entre realizar un tratamiento no quirúrgico subgingival antes de la cirugía o no.
Material y método: El presente estudio es un análisis secundario de un ensayo clínico controlado y aleatorizado multicéntrico con un seguimiento de 12 meses. Para el presente estudio, cuarenta y dos pacientes con periimplantitis se sometieron a una terapia quirúrgica de los implantes afectados por periimplantitis previamente tratados con instrumentación supragingival y subgingival (grupo de control) o con instrumentación submarginal no quirúrgica (grupo test). Se recogieron las variables reportadas por los pacientes (PROMs) en diferentes momentos después de la cirugía en escalas VAS de 100 mm. Los pacientes registraron el dolor postoperatorio, la inflamación, la hemorragia y el malestar general durante la cirugía en los siguientes momentos: inmediatamente después de la cirugía, a las 4, 8 y 12 horas del postoperatorio y a los 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 y 14 días de la intervención. La percepción de los pacientes sobre la cirugía se recogió en un único punto de tiempo inmediatamente después de la cirugía. Se registró el número de comprimidos analgésicos (paracetamol 500 mg) tomados entre los días 0 y 7 del postoperatorio.
Resultados: El promedio de incomodidad intraquirúrgica percibida por el paciente fue de 31.70± 22.35. El dolor inmediatamente después de la cirugía fue de 26.95±19.88 de media y tendió a aumentar después de 4 y 8 horas (30.81±22.12 y 33.04±25.09 respectivamente). Los valores promedios en la escala de dolor alcanzó un mínimo a los 14 (3.88±8.08). El promedio de inflamación fue de 28.32±19.52 e inmediatamente después de la cirugía, aumentó a 29.98±21.85 a las 12 horas del postoperatorio y disminuyó gradualmente hasta el día 14 (3.53±7.80). La hemorragia percibida fue más alta inmediatamente después de la cirugía (19.24±16.56) y disminuyó constantemente hasta el día 14 (2.56±7.41). La ingesta media de paracetamol disminuyó de forma constante desde el día 0 (1.17±1.09) hasta el día 14 (0.34±1.32), y el 63,41% de los pacientes tomaron al menos un comprimido. Las diferencias entre los grupos no fueron significativas para los parámetros evaluados en ninguno de los puntos considerados.
Conclusiones: Los resultados sugieren que el dolor percibido, la hinchazón y la hemorragia son leves después del tratamiento quirúrgico de la periimplantitis y pueden controlarse con un comprimido de analgésico por término medio. Los síntomas disminuyen aún más en los días siguientes. Además, el tipo de instrumentación no quirúrgica no afecta a la percepción del paciente del tratamiento quirúrgico de la periimplantitis.
Objective: to describe the PROMs collected after the surgical treatment of moderate/severe periimplantitis. The hypothesis is that the type of nonsurgical instrumentation will not influence the patient’s perception of the surgical procedure. Material and method: The present study is a secondary study of a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial with a 12-month follow-up. Forty-two patients with peri-implantitis underwent surgical therapy of the affected implants previously treated by supra- and submucosal instrumentation (control group) or supramucosal instrumentation alone (test group), with a follow up period of 2 weeks. PROMs were collected at different time-points after surgery on 100 mm VAS scales. Perceived post-operative pain, swelling, bleeding and overall discomfort during surgery were recorded by the patients at the following time-points: immediately after surgery, 4-, 8-, 12- hours post-operatively and 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7- and 14 days after the procedure. Patient perception of surgery was collected at a single time-point immediately after surgery. The number of analgesic tablets (paracetamol 500 mg) taken from days 0 to 7 post-surgery was recorded. Results: The average discomfort during surgery perceived by the patient was 31.70±22.35. Pain immediately after surgery was 26.95±19.88 on average and tended to increase after 4- and 8 hours (30.81±22.12 and 33.04±25.09, respectively). Average pain scores reached a minimum at 14 days (3.88±8.08). Average swelling was 28.32±19.52 immediately after surgery, increased to 29.98±21.85 at 12 hours post-op and gradually decreased until day 14 (3.53±7.80). Perceived bleeding was highest immediately after surgery (19.24±16.56) and decreased steadily until day 14 (2.56±7.41). Average paracetamol intake decreased steadily from day 0 (1.17±1.09) until day 14 (0.34±1.32), and 63.41% of patients took at least one tablet. Differences between groups (supramucosal alone versus supramucosal combined with submucosal) were not significant for the evaluated parameters at any of the time-points considered. Conclusions: Results suggest that perceived pain, swelling and bleeding are mild after the periimplantitis surgery and can be controlled with one analgesic tablet on average. Symptoms decrease further in the following days. Additionally, the type of non-surgical instrumentation does not affect the patient’s perception of surgical treatment of peri-implantitis
Objective: to describe the PROMs collected after the surgical treatment of moderate/severe periimplantitis. The hypothesis is that the type of nonsurgical instrumentation will not influence the patient’s perception of the surgical procedure. Material and method: The present study is a secondary study of a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial with a 12-month follow-up. Forty-two patients with peri-implantitis underwent surgical therapy of the affected implants previously treated by supra- and submucosal instrumentation (control group) or supramucosal instrumentation alone (test group), with a follow up period of 2 weeks. PROMs were collected at different time-points after surgery on 100 mm VAS scales. Perceived post-operative pain, swelling, bleeding and overall discomfort during surgery were recorded by the patients at the following time-points: immediately after surgery, 4-, 8-, 12- hours post-operatively and 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7- and 14 days after the procedure. Patient perception of surgery was collected at a single time-point immediately after surgery. The number of analgesic tablets (paracetamol 500 mg) taken from days 0 to 7 post-surgery was recorded. Results: The average discomfort during surgery perceived by the patient was 31.70±22.35. Pain immediately after surgery was 26.95±19.88 on average and tended to increase after 4- and 8 hours (30.81±22.12 and 33.04±25.09, respectively). Average pain scores reached a minimum at 14 days (3.88±8.08). Average swelling was 28.32±19.52 immediately after surgery, increased to 29.98±21.85 at 12 hours post-op and gradually decreased until day 14 (3.53±7.80). Perceived bleeding was highest immediately after surgery (19.24±16.56) and decreased steadily until day 14 (2.56±7.41). Average paracetamol intake decreased steadily from day 0 (1.17±1.09) until day 14 (0.34±1.32), and 63.41% of patients took at least one tablet. Differences between groups (supramucosal alone versus supramucosal combined with submucosal) were not significant for the evaluated parameters at any of the time-points considered. Conclusions: Results suggest that perceived pain, swelling and bleeding are mild after the periimplantitis surgery and can be controlled with one analgesic tablet on average. Symptoms decrease further in the following days. Additionally, the type of non-surgical instrumentation does not affect the patient’s perception of surgical treatment of peri-implantitis












