A self-feedback model (SEFEMO): secondary and higher education students’ self-assessment profiles
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2024
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Citations
Exportar
Citation
Panadero, E., Fernández, J., Pinedo, L., Sánchez, I., & García-Pérez, D. (2024). A self-feedback model (SEFEMO): secondary and higher education students’ self-assessment profiles. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2024.2367027
Abstract
While self-assessment is a widely explored area in educational research, our understanding of how students assess themselves, or in other words, generate self-feedback, is quite limited. Self-assessment process has been a black box that recent research is trying to open. This study explored and integrated two data collections (secondary and higher education) that investigated students’ real actions while self-assessing, aiming to disentangle self-assessment into more precise actions. Our goal was to identify self-assessment processes and profiles to better understand what happens when students self-assess and to design and implement better interventions. By combining such data, we were able to explore the differences between secondary and higher education students, the effects of external feedback on self-assessment, and to propose a model of ideal self-assessment (SEFEMO). Using think-aloud protocols, direct observation and self-reported data, we identified six main actions (read, recall, compare, rate, assess, and redo) and four self-assessment profiles. In general, secondary and higher education students showed the same actions and very similar profiles. External feedback had a negative effect on the self-assessment actions except for the less advanced self-assessors. Based on data from more than 500 self-assessment performances, we propose a model of self-feedback.
Description
Financiado por el Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (Generación del conocimiento 2020), PID2019-108982GB-I00.
Spanish National R+D call from the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (Generación del conocimiento 2020), Reference number: PID2019-108982GB-I00.
Referencias bibliográficas:
• Andrade, H., (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. L., Andrade & G. J., Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90–105). Routledge.
• Andrade, H., (2018). Feedback in the context of self-assessment. In A. A., Lipnevich & J. K., Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback (pp. 376–408). Cambridge University Press.
• Boekaerts, M., & Corno L., (2005). Self-Regulation in the Classroom: A Perspective on Assessment and Intervention. Applied Psychology, 54(2), 199–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x
• Boud, D., & Falchikov, N., (1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher-education: A critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18(5), 529–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138746
• Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R., (2014). The future of self-assessment in classroom practice: Reframing self-assessment as a core competency. Frontline Learning Research, 3(2014), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i1.24
• Butler, R., (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.474
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H., (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D., (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379935
• Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M., (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(3), 69–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x
• Eva, K. W., & Regehr, G., (2005). Self-assessment in the health professions: A reformulation and research agenda. Academic Medicine, 80(10), S46–S54. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200510001-00015
• Eva, K. W., & Regehr, G., (2008). “I’ll never play professional football” and other fallacies of self‐assessment. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.150
• Kostons, D., van Gog, T., & Paas, F., (2009). How do I do? Investigating effects of expertise and performance‐process records on self‐assessment. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory & Cognition, 23(9), 1256–1265. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1528
• Kostons, D., van Gog, T., & Paas, F., (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.004
• Lipnevich, A., & Panadero, E., (2021). A review of feedback models and theories: Descriptions, definitions, and conclusions. Frontiers in Education, 6, 720195. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.720195
• Narciss, S., & Zumbach, J., (2022). Formative Assessment and Feedback Strategies. In J., Zumbach, D., Bernstein, S., Narciss, & G., Marsico (Eds.), International Handbook of Psychology Learning and Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26248-8_63-1.
• Nicol, D., (2021). The power of internal feedback: Exploiting natural comparison processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(5), 756–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314
• Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Strijbos, J. W., (2016). The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2
• Panadero, E., Fernández-Ruiz, J., & Sánchez-Iglesias, I., (2020). Secondary education students’ self-assessment: The effects of feedback, subject matter, year level, and gender. Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(6), 607–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1835823
• Panadero, E., García-Pérez, D., Fernández Ruiz, J., Fraile, J., Sánchez-Iglesias, I., & Brown, G. T. L., (2023a). Feedback and year level effects on university students’ self-efficacy and emotions during self-assessment: Positive impact of rubrics vs. instructor feedback. Educational Psychology, 43(7), 756–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2254015
• Panadero, E., García-Pérez, D., Fernández Ruiz, J., Fraile, J., Sánchez-Iglesias, I., & Brown, G. T. L., (2023b). University students’ strategies and criteria during self-assessment: Instructor’s feedback, rubrics, and year level effects. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(3), 1031–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00639-4
• Panadero, E., Lipnevich, A., & Broadbent, J., (2019). Turning self-assessment into self-feedback. In D., Boud, M. D., Henderson, R., Ajjawi, & E., Molloy (Eds.), The impact of feedback in higher education: Improving assessment outcomes for learners (pp. 147–163). Springer.
• Panadero E., Tapia J. A., & Huertas J. A., (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 806–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007
• Pinedo, L., Panadero, E., Fernández-Ruiz, J., & Rodríguez-Hernández, C., (2023). Students’ experiences in self-assessment: Training, processes and feedback use in secondary and higher education. Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice, 30(5–6), 448–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2023.2284630
• Rolheiser, C., (1996). Self-evaluation… Helping kids get better at it: A teacher’s resource book. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
• Sadler, D. R., (2005). Interpretations of criteria‐based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000264262
• Sadler, D. R., (2007). Perils in the meticulous specification of goals and assessment criteria. Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701592097
• Sanchez, C. E., Atkinson, K. M., Koenka, A. C., Moshontz, H., & Cooper, H., (2017). Self-grading and peer-grading for formative and summative assessments in 3rd through 12th grade classrooms: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(8), 1049. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000190
• Sitzmann, T., Ely, K., Brown, K. G., & Bauer, K. N., (2010). Self-assessment of knowledge: A cognitive learning or affective measure?Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.2.zqr169
• Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E., (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M., Boekaerts, P. R., Pintrich, & M., Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). Academic Press.
• Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T., (2017). A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1247–1262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091
• Yan, Z., Brown, G. T., Lee, J. C. K., & Qiu, X. L., (2020). Student self-assessment: Why do they do it?Educational Psychology, 40(4), 509–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1672038
• Yan, Z., & Carless, D., (2021). Self-assessment is about more than self: The enabling role of feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7), 1116–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2001431