Estudio transversal del impacto emocional y de la calidad del sueño de la pandemia COVID-19 en profesionales de enfermería.
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2021
Defense date
2021
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citation
Abstract
Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio observacional transversal es analizar el impacto emocional y de la calidad del sueño de la pandemia por COVID-19 en los profesionales de enfermería.
Método: Se ha medido el impacto emocional con el cuestionario SA-45 y la calidad del sueño con el cuestionario de Oviedo del Sueño (COS) en una muestra de enfermeras y técnicos de cuidados auxiliares de enfermería (N= 247) de los servicios que han atendido a pacientes COVID (UVI, urgencias, plantas de hospitalización, instituto provincial de rehabilitación y planta de paliativos) del Hospital Gregorio Marañón.
Resultados: Entre todas las categorías del SA-45 las puntuaciones medias mayores correspondes a las categorías de somatización (M:1,65; DT:1,08) depresión (M:1,68; DT:1,01), ansiedad (M:1,54; DT:0,97), obsesión compulsión (M:1,4; DT:0,99) e insomnio (M:24,51; DT:7,45) Respecto a la muestra de enfermería, los servicios con mayores puntuaciones son UCI, IPR, urgencia, plantas de hospitalización y la unidad de paliativos. Las mujeres TCAES presentan mayor vulnerabilidad emocional que las enfermeras, y los trabajadores interinos que los eventuales o fijos. No se han encontrado diferencias para estado civil, edad o antigüedad o número de días atendiendo a pacientes COVID.
Conclusión: El personal de enfermería ha estado expuesto física y anímicamente a la pandemia. Las muertes de los pacientes, el miedo al contagio y la carga de trabajo han podido ser algunos de los causantes del malestar psicológico que ahora presentan y que no debe descuidarse para poder garantizar su bienestar emocional y de esta manera aportar unos cuidados de mayor calidad.
Objective: The aim of this cross-sectional study is the emotional impact and the sleeping quality symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic in nurses and auxiliary nursing care technicians. Methods: The emotional impact was measured with the SA-45 questionnaire and the quality of sleep with the Oviedo sleep questionnaire (COS) taking a sample of nurses and auxiliary nursing care technicians (N = 247) in the services they attended to COVID patients (ICU, emergencies, hospitalization plants, provincial rehabilitation institute and palliative plant) of the Gregorio Marañón Hospital. Results: Higher mean scores have been found for the somatization categories (M: 1,65; DT: 1,08) depression (M: 1,68; DT: 1,01), anxiety (M: 1,54; DT: 0,97), obsession, compulsion (M: 1,4; DT: 0,99) and insomnia (M: 24,51; DT: 7,45) The services with the highest scores being the ICU, the IPR, the emergency department, the hospitalization floors and the palliative unit. TCAES women are more vulnerable than nurses, and temporary workers than permanent ones. No differences have been found for marital status, age or seniority or the number of days caring for COVID patients. Conclusion: Nursing staff have been physically and emotionally exposed to the pandemic. The deaths of patients, the fear of contagion and the workload have been some of the causes of the psychological discomfort that they now present and that should not be neglected in order to guarantee their emotional well-being and in this way provide higher quality care.
Objective: The aim of this cross-sectional study is the emotional impact and the sleeping quality symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic in nurses and auxiliary nursing care technicians. Methods: The emotional impact was measured with the SA-45 questionnaire and the quality of sleep with the Oviedo sleep questionnaire (COS) taking a sample of nurses and auxiliary nursing care technicians (N = 247) in the services they attended to COVID patients (ICU, emergencies, hospitalization plants, provincial rehabilitation institute and palliative plant) of the Gregorio Marañón Hospital. Results: Higher mean scores have been found for the somatization categories (M: 1,65; DT: 1,08) depression (M: 1,68; DT: 1,01), anxiety (M: 1,54; DT: 0,97), obsession, compulsion (M: 1,4; DT: 0,99) and insomnia (M: 24,51; DT: 7,45) The services with the highest scores being the ICU, the IPR, the emergency department, the hospitalization floors and the palliative unit. TCAES women are more vulnerable than nurses, and temporary workers than permanent ones. No differences have been found for marital status, age or seniority or the number of days caring for COVID patients. Conclusion: Nursing staff have been physically and emotionally exposed to the pandemic. The deaths of patients, the fear of contagion and the workload have been some of the causes of the psychological discomfort that they now present and that should not be neglected in order to guarantee their emotional well-being and in this way provide higher quality care.