Para depositar en Docta Complutense, identifícate con tu correo @ucm.es en el SSO institucional. Haz clic en el desplegable de INICIO DE SESIÓN situado en la parte superior derecha de la pantalla. Introduce tu correo electrónico y tu contraseña de la UCM y haz clic en el botón MI CUENTA UCM, no autenticación con contraseña.

Percutaneous mitral valve repair with MitraClip device inhemodynamically unstable patients: A systematic review

Citation

Martinez-Gomez E, McInerney A, Tirado-Conte G, et al. Percutaneous mitral valve repair with MitraClip device in hemodynamically unstable patients: A systematic review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;98: E617–E625. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29703Martinez-Gomez E, McInerney A, Tirado-Conte G, et al. Percutaneous mitral valve repair with MitraClip device in hemodynamically unstable patients: A systematic review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;98: E617–E625. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29703Martinez-Gomez E, McInerney A, Tirado-Conte G, et al. Percutaneous mitral valve repair with MitraClip device in hemodynamically unstable patients: A systematic review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;98: E617–E625. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29703Martinez-Gomez E, McInerney A, Tirado-Conte G, et al. Percutaneous mitral valve repair with MitraClip device in hemodynamically unstable patients: A systematic review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;98: E617–E625. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29703Martinez-Gomez E, McInerney A, Tirado-Conte G, et al. Percutaneous mitral valve repair with MitraClip device in hemodynamically unstable patients: A systematic review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;98: E617–E625. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29703

Abstract

Background Very few data exist on percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVr) in unstable patients with concomitant moderate–severe mitral regurgitation (MR). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate baseline characteristics, management and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients undergoing PMVr with MitraClip. Methods We conducted a systematic review of the published data on MitraClip from its first use in 2003 to December 2020. Studies referring to critically ill patients in cardiogenic shock or acute refractory pulmonary edema were included. A total of 40 publications including 254 patients with significant MR (Grade 4 in 91%) were included. Results Mean age was 70 ± 12 years with mean Euroscore II and STS of 21 ± 13 and 20.5 ± 16, respectively. Clinical presentation was with cardiogenic shock and acute myocardial infarction in 72.8 and 60.0% of patients, respectively. Device success was achieved in 238 (93.7%) patients with a significant reduction in MR (Grade ≤ 2 in 91.8%, p < .001). The median weaning time from the procedure, to discontinuation of mechanical circulatory or respiratory support, was 2 days (IQR 1–4), with an in-hospital mortality and non-fatal complication rate of 12.6 and 9.1%, respectively. Kaplan–Meier curves estimated an overall mortality rate of 39.1% at 12-month follow-up, with persistent reduction in MR severity for survivors (Grade ≤ 2 in 81.3%) and one case of mitral valve reintervention. Conclusions Percutaneous mitral valve repair with MitraClip device is a technically feasible and potentially viable management option in high-risk patients with cardiogenic shock or refractory pulmonary edema and concomitant moderate–severe MR. Prospective trials are required to confirm these findings, and definitively determine the value of MitraClip in hemodynamically unstable patients.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Description

UCM subjects

Unesco subjects

Keywords

Collections