Aviso: para depositar documentos, por favor, inicia sesión e identifícate con tu cuenta de correo institucional de la UCM con el botón MI CUENTA UCM. No emplees la opción AUTENTICACIÓN CON CONTRASEÑA
 

On the apparent synonymy between two Spanish agentive suffixes: –dor and –nte

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Official URL

Full text at PDC

Publication date

2012

Advisors (or tutors)

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Citations
Google Scholar

Citation

Abstract

We expect with this study to unveil the differences between these deverbal suffixes and to show that there is not any synonymy and the suffixes are semantically and aspectually specified. We adopt a syntactic approach in order to explain the data. That is, derivatives associated with verbal predicates contain functional projections: AspP, VoiceP, vP, etc. (Marantz 1997, Alexiadou 2001, Borer 2005). In this sense, we expect to show that the different semantic-aspectual interpretations may be determined by the presence of different functional projections.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Description

Referencias bibliográficas: • Alexiadou, A. (2001): Functional structure in nominals: nominalization and ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. • Borer, H. (2005): Structuring Sense. Oxford: OUP. • Laca, B. (1993): “Las nominalizaciones orientadas y los derivados españoles en –dor y –nte”, Varela, S. (ed.), La formación de palabras, Madrid: Taurus. • Marantz, A. (1997): “No escape from syntax”. UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics, 4: 201-225. • Rainer, F. (1999): “La derivación adjetival”. Bosque, I. and V. Demonte (dirs.), Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, v. 3, cap. 70, Madrid: Espasa. • Rifón, A. (1996-1997): “Sinonimia y polisemia de los sufijos –dor y –nte”. Revista de Lexicografía, III.

Keywords