An Automated Blood Pressure Display for Self-Measurement in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (iHealth Track): Device Validation Study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Full text at PDC
Publication date

2020

Authors
Mazoteras Pardo, Victoria
Losa Iglesias, Marta Elena
López López, Daniel
Palomo López Patricia
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
JMIR Publications
Citations
Google Scholar
Citation
Mazoteras-Pardo V, Becerro-De-Bengoa-Vallejo R, Losa-Iglesias ME, López-López D, Calvo-Lobo C, Rodríguez-Sanz D, Martínez-Jiménez EM, Palomo-López P An Automated Blood Pressure Display for Self-Measurement in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease (iHealth Track): Device Validation Study JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(4):e14702 doi: 10.2196/14702 PMID: 32238337 PMCID: 7163421
Abstract
Background: Hypertension is a global public health issue and is closely related to chronic kidney disorder (CKD). In people with CKD, strict monitoring of blood pressure is an important part of therapy. Objective: The aim of this research was to validate the iHealth Track blood pressure monitoring device for patients with CKD according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol 2010 (ESH-IP2). Methods: In total, 33 patients who received hemodialysis in Plasencia participated in the study. There were 9 successive measurements made, which conformed to the ESH-IP2. We calculated the differences between the standard reference device (Omron M3 Intellisense) and the test device (iHealth Track) for blood pressure and heart rate values. For 99 total comparisons of paired measurements, we classified differences into various categories (≤5 mmHg, ≤10 mmHg, and ≤15 mmHg for blood pressure; ≤3, ≤5, and ≤8 beats per minute for heart rate). Results: In 90 of 99 systolic blood pressure and 89 of 99 diastolic blood pressure comparisons between the devices, measurement differences were within 5 mmHg. In 81 of 99 heart rate comparisons between the devices, measurement differences were within 3 beats per minute. The mean differences between the test and reference standard measurements were 3.27 (SD 2.99) mmHg for systolic blood pressure, 3.59 (SD 4.55) mmHg for diastolic blood pressure, and 2.18 (SD 2.75) beats per minute for heart rate. We also observed that for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, 31 of 33 participants had at least two of three comparisons between the devices with measurement differences less than 5 mmHg. For heart rate, 28 of 33 patients had at least two of three comparisons between the devices with measurement differences less than 3 beats per minute. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that iHealth Track meets the requirements of the ESH-IP2 in patients with CKD. Therefore, the iHealth Track is suitable for use in renal patients.
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Description
Health Track; validation; blood pressure; heart rate; International Protocol
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Collections