Publication: Foreign MNEs and domestic innovative capabilities: are there conditions for reverse spillovers in the spanish industry?
Full text at PDC
Advisors (or tutors)
Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales (ICEI)
We analyse, over 2004-2008, a sample of approximately 700 foreign subsidiaries and 4,500 domestic firms located in Spain in order to understand the relationship between local R&D cooperation and innovativeness of the firm. Our ultimate objective is to understand whether foreign subsidiaries are likely to make a contribution to local innovative capabilities or if, conversely, they may eventually benefit from conditions for reverse spillovers. Using a variety of specifications for the innovation-related activities of the firm, we find that foreign subsidiaries are more cooperative than the average firm located in Spain, but not necessarily more than affiliated domestic firms (entrepreneurial groups). However, foreign subsidiaries are more cooperative than affiliated domestic firms in sectors considered highly dynamic by international technological standards, whether Spain has a technical advantage in these specific sectors or not. When we focus on companies which are more innovative than the two-digit industries in which they operate, we find that foreign subsidiaries tend to be more cooperative than domestic firms in sectors where Spain displays technological advantage. These sectors comprise traditional industries displaying little innovation dynamism from an international point of view. This finding suggests that there may be conditions for reverse spillovers in these specific Spanish sectors (though measuring them is beyond the objectives of this paper).
Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3): 425. Almeida, P. 2004. Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 847-64. Annique Un, C. & A.M. Romero-Martínez. 2009. Determinants of R&D collaboration of service firms. Service Business, 3: 373-94. Bjorvatn, K. & C. Eckel. 2006. Technology sourcing and strategic Foreign Direct Investment. Review of International Economics, 14(4): 600-14. Caves, R.E. 1996. Multinational enterprise and economic analysis. 2nd ed: Cambridge University Press. Crone, M. & S. Roper. 1999. Knowledge transfers from multinational plants in Northern Ireland. Paper presented at Regional Science Association European Congress, Vienna, Austria. Damijan, J.P., C. Kostevc, & M. Rojec. 2010. Does a foreign subsidiary’s network status affect its innovation activity? Evidence from post-socialist economies. Madrid: ICEI, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Driffield, N. & J.H. Love. 2003. Foreign Direct Investment, technology sourcing and reverse spillovers. The Manchester School, 71(6): 659-72. Dunning, J.H. & S.M. Lundan. 2009. The internationalization of corporate R&D: A review of the evidence and some policy implications for home countries. Review of Policy Research, 26(1-2): 13-34. Ebersberger, B., S.J. Herstad, E. Iversen, E. Kirner, & O. Som. 2011. Analysis of innovation drivers and barriers in support of better policies. Economic and market intelligence on innovation. Oslo: European Commission. Enterprise and Industry. Fosfuri, A. & M. Motta. 1999. Multinationals without advantages. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 10(4): 617-30. Frost, T.S. 2001. The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries’ innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 101-23. Guimón, J. 2009. Government strategies to attract R&D -intensive FDI. J.Tecnol.Transf., DOI 10.1007/s10961-008-9091-1. Knell, M. & M. Srholec. 2005. Innovation cooperation and foreign ownership in the Czech Republic. Oslo: University of Oslo. Kuemmerle, W. 1999. Foreign direct investment in industrial research in the pharmaceutical and electronics industries- results from a survey of multinationals. Research Policy, 28: 179-93. Malerba, F. 2002. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31: 247-64. Molero, J. & A. García. 2008. The innovative activities of foreign subsidiaries in the Spanish Innovation System: An evaluation of their impact from a sectoral taxonomy approach. Technovation, 28: 739-57. Molero, J. & J. Heijs. 2002. Differences of innovative behaviour between national and foreign firms: measuring the impact of foreign firms on national innovation systems. Int.J.Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 2(2/3): 122-45. Pavitt, K. 1984. Patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13: 343-73. Phene, A. & P. Almeida. 2008. Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: the role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 39: 901-19. Radosevic, S. & D. Dyker. 2007. Technological integration and global marginalisation of Central and East european Economies: the role of FDI and alliances: Science Policy Research Unit. Segarra-Blasco, A. & J.-M. Arauzo-Carod. 2008. Sources of innovation and industry-university interaction: Evidence from Spanish firms. Research Policy, 37: 1283-95. Srholec, M. 2009. Does foreign ownsership facilitate cooperation on innovation? Firm-level evidence from the enlarged European Union. European Journal of Development Research, 21(1): 47-62. Torbett, R. 2001. Technological collaboration, firm size and innovation: A study of UK manufacturing firms.In OECD, editor, Innovative networks: co-operation in national innovation systems. Paris: OECD. UNCTAD, editor. 2001. World Investment Report 2001. Promoting Linkages. New York and Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. UNCTAD. 2012. World investment report 2012. Geneva: UNCTAD. Vega-Jurado, J., A. Gutiérrez-García, & I. Fernández-de-Lucio. 2009. Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(4): 637-70.