Validación española de la Escala de Detección de altas capacidades, «Gifted Rating Scales 2 (GRS 2-S) School Form», para profesores
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication date
2024
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad de Navarra
Citations
Exportar
Citation
Tourón, M., Tourón, J., & Navarro-Asencio, E. (2024). Validación española de la Escala de Detección de altas capacidades, «Gifted Rating Scales 2 (GRS 2-S) School Form», para profesores. Estudios Sobre Educación, 46, 33-55. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.46.002
Abstract
En este trabajo se aborda el primer estudio sobre la validez de constructo de la Escala de Detección para profesores GRS 2 en España, sobre una muestra de 348 sujetos. Se llevó a cabo un estudio factorial confirmatorio, AFC, utilizando procedimientos de estimación (WLSMV) de mínimos cuadrados robustos. Se ha seleccionado una estructura de seis factores que explica el 66% de la varianza. Los índices de ajuste del modelo son satisfactorios (CFI, ,93; TLI, ,93). La validez convergente (AVE, ,66) y la fiabilidad compuesta (entre ,87 y ,96) son adecuadas. Esta escala es la primera validada en España y aporta una medida relevante para la identificación de los alumnos con alta capacidad.
This paper deals with the first study on the construct validity of the GRS 2 Rating Scale for Teachers in Spain, on a sample of 348 subjects. A confirmatory factorial study, CFA, was carried out using robust least squares estimation procedures (WLSMV). A six-factor structure has been selected that explains 66% of the variance. The fit indices of the model are satisfactory (CFI, .93; TLI, .93). Convergent validity (AVE, .66) and composite reliability (between .87 and .96) are adequate. This scale is the first validated in Spain and provides a relevant measure for the identification of high ability students. © 2023 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra. All rights reserved.
This paper deals with the first study on the construct validity of the GRS 2 Rating Scale for Teachers in Spain, on a sample of 348 subjects. A confirmatory factorial study, CFA, was carried out using robust least squares estimation procedures (WLSMV). A six-factor structure has been selected that explains 66% of the variance. The fit indices of the model are satisfactory (CFI, .93; TLI, .93). Convergent validity (AVE, .66) and composite reliability (between .87 and .96) are adequate. This scale is the first validated in Spain and provides a relevant measure for the identification of high ability students. © 2023 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra. All rights reserved.
Description
Financiación: este estudio ha recibido financiación del Vicerrectorado de Investigación de la Universidad Internacional de La Rioja. Agradecemos el apoyo del prof. Steven I. Pfeiffer que nos proporcionó los ítems de la versión en desarrollo del GRS 2 para esta investigación.
Referencias bibliográficas:
• Abdulla, A. M. y Cramond, B. (2017). After Six Decades of Systematic Study of Creativity: What do Teachers Need to Know About What it is and How it is Measured? Roeper Review, 39(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2016.1247398
• Bishop, G. F. (2011). Item Order Randomization. En P. J. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods (pp. 397-399). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n255
• Cao, T. H., Jung, J. Y. y Lee, J. (2017). Assessment in Gifted Education: A Review of the Literature from 2005 to 2016. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28(3), 163-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x17714572
• Clinkenbeard, P. R. (2012). Motivation and gifted students: Implications of theory and research. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 622-630. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21628
• Cropley, A. J. (2000). Defining and Measuring Creativity: Are Creativity Tests Worth Using? Roeper Review, 23(2), 72-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554069
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. y Wolfe, R. (2000). New Conceptions and Research Approaches to Creativity: Implications of a Systems Perspective for Creativity in Education. En K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. Subotnik, R. Sternberg (Eds.), International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 81-93). Pergamon Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-008043796-5/50006-1
• Dai, D. Y. (2018). A History of Giftedness: Paradigms and Paradoxes. En S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of Giftedness in Children (pp. 1-14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_1
• Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance. Scribner/Simon & Schuster.
• Duckworth, A. L. y Seligman, M. E. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939- 944. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x
• Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House.
• Feldman, D. H. (1992). Has There Been a Paradigm Shift in Gifted Education: Some thoughts on a changing national scene. En N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline y D. L. Ambrose (Eds.), Talent Development: Proceedings from 1991 Henry and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 89-94). Trillium.
• Ferrando, P. J., Lorenzo-Seva, U., Hernandez-Dorado, A. y Muniz, J. (2022). Decalogo para el Analisis Factorial de los Items de un Test. Psicothema, 34(1), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.456
• Gagne, F. (1993). Constructs and Models Pertaining to Exceptional Human Abilities. En K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks y A. H. Passow (Eds.), International Handbook of Research and Development of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 69-87). Pergamon Press.
• Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary Genius: An Inquiry into its Laws and Consequences. Macmillan and Co.
• Gaskin, C. J. y Happell, B. (2014). On Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Review of Recent Evidence and Assessment of Current Practice, and Recommendations for Future Use. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(3), 511-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.10.005
• Guilford, J. P. y Merrifield, P. R. (1960). The Structure of Intellect Model: Its uses and implications. Studies of aptitudes of high-level personnel. University of Southern California, Psychological Laboratory.
• Hu, L. T. y Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Jarosewich, T., Pfeiffer, S. I. y Morris, J. (2002). Identifying Gifted Students Using Teacher Rating Scales: A Review of Existing Instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20(4), 322-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290202000401
• Kozbelt, A. (2019). Reflections on Talent Development in the Performing Arts: Concluding Comments. En R. F. Subotnik, P. Olszewski-Kubilius y F. C. Worrell (Eds.), The Psychology of High Performance: Developing Human Potential into Domain-Specific Talent (pp. 301-307). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000120-014
• Lee, D. y Pfeiffer, S. I. (2006). The Reliability and Validity of a Korean-Translated Version of the Gifted Rating Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24(3), 210-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282906287829
• Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory Factor Analysis with Ordinal Data: Comparing Robust Maximum Likelihood and Diagonally Weighted Least Squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 936-949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
• Li, H., Pfeiffer, S. I., Petscher, Y., Kumtepe, A. T. y Mo, G. (2008). Validation of the Gifted Rating Scales-School Form in China. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(2), 160-169 https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208315802
• Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernandez-Baeza, A. y Tomas-Marco, I. (2014). El analisis factorial exploratorio de los items: una guia practica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 30(3), 1151-1169. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
• Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the Gifted and Talented. Report to the Congress of the United States by the US Commissioner of Education. US Government Printing Office.
• Monks, F. J., Heller, K. A. y Passow, A. H. (2000). The study of giftedness: reflections on where we are and where we are going. En K. A. Heller, F. J.
• Monks, R. J. Sternberg y R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 839-863). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-008043796-5/50060-7
• Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Connelly, M. S. y Marks, M. A. (2000a). Leadership Skills: Conclusions and Future Directions. Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(99)00047-8
• Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Harding, F. D., Jacobs, T. O. y Fleishman, E. A. (2000b). Leadership Skills for a Changing World: Solving Complex Social Problems. Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 11-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(99)00041-7
• Muthen, B. O., Muthen, L. K. y Asparouhov, T. (2017). Regression and Mediation Analysis Using Mplus. Muthen & Muthen.
• Olszewski-Kubilius, P. M. (2000). The Transition from Childhood Giftedness to Adult Creative Productiveness: Psychological Characteristics and Social Supports. Roeper Review, 23, 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554068
• Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Subotnik, R. F. y Worrell, F. C. (2015). Antecedent and Concurrent Psychosocial Skills that Support High Levels of Achievement Within Talent Domains. High Ability Studies, 26(2), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1095077
• Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Worrell, F. C., Subotnik, R. F. y Foley-Nicpon, M. (2019). Reflections on Talent Development in Academics. En R. F. Subotnik, P. Olszewski- Kubilius y F. C. Worrell (Eds.), The Psychology of High Performance: Developing Human Potential into Domain-Specific Talent (pp. 225-236). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000120-011
• Perez, E., Heredia, D. E., Furlan, L., Zalazar, P., Lescano, C., Pfeiffer, S. y Rosado, J. (2012). Propiedades Psicometricas de la Escala de Clasificacion del Talento (Gifted Rating Scales-forma-escolar, GRS-S) en una muestra argentina. Perspectivas en Psicología, 9(3), 134-141.
• Pfeiffer, S. I. (2015). Essentials of Gifted Assessment. John Wiley & Sons.
• Pfeiffer, S. I. (2017). Identificación y evaluación del alumnado con altas capacidades: Una guía práctica. UNIR Editorial.
• Pfeiffer, S. I. y Jarosewich, T. (2003). GRS: Gifted Rating Scales. Psychological Corporation.
• Pink, D. H. (2009). Drive: The surprising truth about what motives us. Riverhead Books.
• Plucker, J. A., Guo, J. y Makel, M. C. (2018). Creativity. En S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of Giftedness in Children (pp. 81-99). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_6
• Robinson, A. y Clinkenbeard, P. R. (2008). History of Giftedness: Perspectives from the past presage modern scholarship. En S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of Giftedness in Children (pp. 13-31). Springer.
• Rosado, J. I., Pfeiffer, S. I. y Petscher, Y. (2008). The Reliability and Validity of a Spanish Translated Version of the Gifted Rating Scales. Gifted and Talented International, 23(1), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2008.11673517
• Rosado, J. I., Pfeiffer, S. y Petscher, Y. (2015). Identifying Gifted Students in Puerto Rico: Validation of a Spanish Translation of the Gifted Rating Scales. Gifted Education International, 31(2), 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429413507178
• Rosenbach, W. E. (2018). Contemporary Issues in Leadership. Routledge.
• Runco, M. A. (2014). “Big C, Little c” Creativity as a False Dichotomy: Reality is not Categorical. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 131-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.873676
• Ryan, R. M. y Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
• Schneider, W. (2000). Giftedness, Expertise, and (exceptional) Performance: A Developmental Perspective. En K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg y R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 165- 177). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-008043796-5/50012-7
• Shaughnessy, M. F. (2022). An Interview with Steven I. Pfeiffer: Gifted Rating Scales-(GRS [TM] 2). North American Journal of Psychology, 24(1), 1-1.
• Silverman, L. K. (2018). Assessment of Giftedness. En S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of Giftedness in Children (pp. 183-207). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_12
• Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, Personal, Developmental, and Social Aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.151
• Sternberg, R. J. (2000a). Giftedness as Developing Expertise. En K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg y R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 55-66). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-008043796-5/50004-8
• Sternberg, R. J. (2000b). Identifying and Developing Creative Giftedness. Roeper Review, 23(2), 60-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554067
• Sternberg, R. J. y Davidson, J. E. (Eds.) (2005). Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455
• Sternberg, R. J. y Kaufman, S. B. (2018). Theories and Conceptions of Giftedness. En S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of Giftedness in Children (pp. 29-47). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_3
• Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P. y Worrell, F. C. (Eds.) (2019). The Psychology of High Performance: Developing Human Potential Into Domain-Specific Talent. American Psychological Association.
• Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic Studies of Genius. Volume 1. Mental and Physical Traits of a Thousand Gifted Children. Volume 1. Stanford University Press.
• Touron, J. (2020). Las altas capacidades en el sistema educativo espanol: reflexiones sobre el concepto y la identificacion. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 38(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.396781
• Touron, J., Martin, D., Navarro Asensio, E., Pradas, S. e Inigo, V. (2018). Validacion de constructo de un instrumento para medir la competencia digital docente de los profesores (CDD). Revista Española de Pedagogía, 76(269), 2554. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP761201802
• Touron, J., Peralta, F. y Reparaz, C. (1998). La Superdotación Intelectual: Modelos, Identificación y Estrategias Educativas. EUNSA.
• Touron, J., Reparaz, C. y Peralta, F. (2006). Las nominaciones de los profesores en la identificacion de alumnos de alta capacidad intelectual. Sobredotaçao, 7, 7-25.
• Touron, M., Navarro-Asencio, E. y Touron, J. (2023). Validez de Constructo de la Escala de Deteccion de Alumnos con Altas Capacidades para Padres (GRS 2), en Espana. Revista de Educación.
• Treffinger, D. J. y Feldhusen, J. F. (1996). Talent Recognition and Development: Successor to Gifted Education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19(2), 181-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329601900205
• Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A. y Doval, E. (2017). A Journey Around Alpha and Omega to Estimate Internal Consistency Reliability. Annals of Psychology, 33(3), 755-782. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401
• Winner, E. y Martino, G. (2000). Giftedness in Non-Academic Domains: The Case of the Visual Arts and Music. En K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg y R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 95-110). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-008043796-5/50007-3
• Xia, Y. (2016). Investigating the Chi-square Based Model-fit Indexes for WLSMV and ULSMV Estimators (Dissertation). Florida State University. http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_2016SU_Xia_fsu_0071E_13379
• Zaccaro, S. J., Green, J. P., Dubrow, S. y Kolze, M. (2018). Leader Individual Differences, Situational Parameters, and Leadership Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review and Integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 2-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.10.003